Search for: "The State of South Dakota"
Results 4781 - 4800
of 6,131
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2021, 1:12 pm
The Federal Public Defender for the Districts of South Dakota and North Dakota Assistant Federal Public Defender, Rapid City, SD. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 10:06 am
This means, for instance, that a North Dakota resident might be notified of a data breach, while a South Dakota resident would not be notified of the same breach. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 8:22 am
The bill would require the Department of Defense to investigate and remediate PFAS contamination at and surrounding DOD installations in the U.S. and state-owned National Guard facilities as well. [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 2:59 pm
South Dakota also approved sales for medical use, as did Mississippi. [read post]
18 Mar 2022, 4:00 am
Already several ex-Trump lawyers have found themselves subject to state bar reviews. [read post]
17 May 2018, 3:59 pm
South Dakota also approved sales for medical use, as did Mississippi. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 7:24 pm
To put that in perspective, that’s approximately 1% of the total annual budgets for Delaware, South Dakota, Montana or West Virginia. [read post]
7 Mar 2015, 10:15 am
Since the relevant part of the ACA is not a statute that offers conditional funds to state governments, but only private citizens, none of the rules laid out in conditional spending cases such as South Dakota v. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 9:01 pm
They chose Oliver Robinson Jr. then a state representative. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 9:01 pm
They chose Oliver Robinson Jr. then a state representative. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 12:23 pm
United States and Printz v. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 6:54 am
At the state and local level, there are currently 10 jurisdictions that have statutes or case law specifically addressing an employer’s requirement to reimburse business expenses, generally: California, Iowa, Illinois, Massachusetts, Montana, New Hampshire, North Dakota, South Dakota, District of Columbia, and Seattle, Washington. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 1:32 pm
The outcome of this case could have a significant impact on his strategy going forward. [1] The states are Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, West Virginia, and Wyoming. [2] Texas, et al. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 1:32 pm
The outcome of this case could have a significant impact on his strategy going forward. [1] The states are Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, West Virginia, and Wyoming. [2] Texas, et al. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 9:01 am
In Planned Parenthood Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota v. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 4:00 am
Supreme Court State of Texas v. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 5:11 pm
State Bar of Texas Section Report - Family Law - Fall 2009 by Jimmy L. [read post]
24 May 2020, 5:34 am
In the 1987 case, South Dakota v. [read post]
4 May 2021, 11:57 am
Supreme Court’s majority opinion in the South Dakota v. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 4:22 am
” Briefly: At The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Steven Mazie breaks down Tuesday’s oral argument in South Dakota v. [read post]
