Search for: "U.S. v. Mark" Results 4781 - 4800 of 11,358
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jul 2016, 9:51 pm by RegBlog
This week of the Democratic National Convention also marks the launch of RegBlog’s special focus on the U.S. election, which will be spotlighted on the site’s homepage through November. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 7:55 pm
By 2008 U.S. courts deemed the area to be under de facto sovereignty of the United States (Boumediene v. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 1:54 pm by Eugene Volokh
It used to be true that there were separate courts of law and equity in many U.S. jurisdictions. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 9:23 am by Ron Coleman
V Secret Catalogue, Inc., 537 U.S. 418, 434 (2003). [read post]
17 Jul 2016, 10:00 pm
However, marks comprised of a single color alone are never inherently distinctive.Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 1:17 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Visciotti, 537 U.S. 19, 24 (2002) (per curiam) (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 6:55 am by Amy Howe
Briefly: Greg Stohr of Bloomberg News reports that, at “the shorthanded U.S. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 6:00 am by Martha Engel
  As the TTAB ruled earlier this year in  Noble House Home Furnishings, LLC v. [read post]