Search for: "Weeks v. United States"
Results 4781 - 4800
of 19,102
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2019, 5:45 am
That’s all for this week. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 12:45 pm
Both sides appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and the court reversed the first part of the decision, ruling the thumbnails to be a fair use. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 10:38 am
United States and Virginia House of Delegates v. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 1:31 am
The Supreme Court of Wisconsin in Ableman v. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm
Administrative Review Board, United States Department of Labor, which became known as “the Case of the Frozen Trucker. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 5:30 am
To improve surveillance, the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists has recommended that all L. monocytogenes isolates be forwarded to state public health laboratories for subtyping through the National Molecular Subtyping Network for Foodborne Disease Surveillance (PulseNet). [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 4:15 am
United States, the justices voted 7-2 to reaffirm the “separate sovereigns” exception to the Constitution’s double jeopardy clause, allowing federal and state governments to prosecute a defendant for the same conduct. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm
This defense comes from a United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit case (also, confusingly enough, named City of New York v. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 6:43 pm
United States Postal Service (here). [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 2:17 pm
Both patent law and trademark law are administered by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 12:45 pm
United States from the October sitting. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 3:16 am
Richard transferred all his real property to the LLC in exchange for ownership of 100 Class A Units (income units) and 900 Class B Units (ownership and voting units). [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 4:34 pm
The most important media law event of the week was the judgment of the Supreme Court in Lachaux v Independent Print ([2019] UKSC 27). [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 12:42 pm
Montreal Trading Ltd. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 12:42 pm
Montreal Trading Ltd. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 12:42 pm
Montreal Trading Ltd. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 2:49 pm
See also, Miller v. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 2:18 pm
There appeared to be legitimate reasons to support Trump’s first use of this formerly unusual device: The House judiciary committee had given the Justice Department essentially two weeks to comply with a sweeping subpoena covering millions of pages of documents, many which included potentially sensitive information, including classified and grand jury information. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 1:24 pm
Related Cases: Alasaad v. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 10:10 am
In its 1983 decision in the matter of INS v. [read post]
