Search for: "State v. E. E. B." Results 4801 - 4820 of 10,085
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2015, 2:24 pm by John Elwood
The judge who was assigned this case, which challenges Maryland’s reapportionment, decided that a three-judge panel was not required because the complaint failed to state a claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). [read post]
29 May 2015, 1:11 pm by Martin Miller
§ 271(b) states: “Whoever actively induces infringement of a patent shall be liable as an infringer. [read post]
29 May 2015, 10:17 am by Guest Blogger
  You can reach him by e-mail at simon at theusconstitution.org [read post]
28 May 2015, 6:02 pm by Brian Toth
 § 9003(e)(2)(B) ("[A] respondent who opposes the return of the child has the burden of establishing ... by a preponderance of the evidence that any other exception set forth in article 12 ... applies. [read post]
28 May 2015, 2:29 pm by Schachtman
” Id. at 590 n.9 (1993) (citing and quoting James E. [read post]
28 May 2015, 8:23 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Copyright Office: Jacqueline CharlesworthMichelle ChoeRegan SmithCy DonnellySteve RuheJohn RileyStacy Cheney (NTIA) Proposed Class 5: Audiovisual works – derivative uses – multimedia e-books This proposed class would allow circumvention of access controls on lawfully made and acquired motion pictures used in connection with multimedia e-book authorship. [read post]
28 May 2015, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
Paper records are not affected by the state and use of all the file drawers and boxes used in a paper records system. [read post]
28 May 2015, 12:00 am by Pietro Franzina
Annex B lists the relevant insolvency practitioners based on national laws. [read post]
27 May 2015, 6:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
(see CPLR 217[1]; see also Matter of Biondo v New York State Bd. of Parole, 60 NY2d 832, 834 [1983]). [read post]
26 May 2015, 2:08 pm
So anyone who claims that the Senate never considered withholding subsidies in recalcitrant states is either a) dishonest, or b) doesn’t know what they’re talking about. [read post]
21 May 2015, 10:19 am by John Elwood
” Lockhart’s petition asks “whether § 2252(b)(2)’s mandatory minimum sentence is triggered by a prior conviction … that did not ‘involv[e] a minor or ward. [read post]