Search for: "MATTER OF L R" Results 4821 - 4840 of 7,381
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2012, 12:12 pm by Paul Maharg
Elbers, R. van der Veer and W. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 4:49 pm by Ronda Muir
"  Big losers of 30+ partners include K&L Gates, McDermott Will, Hunton Williams, DLA Piper, Latham & Watkins, and SNR Benton. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 2:11 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix Chambers.
In the Matter of S (a child), heard 20 February 2012. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 8:25 am by Schachtman
Judge Rakoff’s insistence that requiring “statistical significance” at the customary 5% level would change the plaintiffs’ burden of proof, and require greater certitude for epidemiologists than for other expert witnesses who opine in less “rigorous” fields of learning, is wrong as a matter of fact. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 5:54 am by Rob Robinson
– bit.ly/A0LSpr (Jennifer Connelly) Courts Tackle Spyware Interceptions - bit.ly/AbezOp (Peter Crusco) Criminal Law Catches Up: New ESI Guidelines Issued – bit.ly/yVpQvH (Shira Scheindlin, Jeffrey Rabkin) Data Preservation is Critical in Trade Secrets Cases | Littler - bit.ly/zpf7Gm (Douglas Wickham) E-Discovery: Avoiding eDiscovery Offenses in State Courts - bit.ly/xXmfK9 (Matthew Prewitt) eDiscovery Court Pilot Programs: eDiscovery Templates… [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 5:13 pm by Jon L. Gelman
Highlights Include: Electronic Discovery s.22.33 Medicare Conditional Payments 29.32 and 29.33 Jon L. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 6:16 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
In the Matter of S (a child), heard 20 February 2012. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 1:35 pm by Fred Abrams
There is however, another difference between the Second Superseding Indictment and the previous indictments in this matter. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 8:00 am by Sonya Hubbard
When the New York Times (NYT) and its president and former chief executive, Janet L. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 7:24 am by Sasha Volokh
“[L]egitimate policing,” after all, “is necessarily non-partisan” and “bound up with impartiality,”and only “the state, if properly constructed, can both represent us collectively . . . and yet speak for no private party in particular. [read post]