Search for: "DOE 5" Results 4841 - 4860 of 84,938
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2023, 3:02 pm by lcampbell@lawbc.com
” PRIA 5 specifies that the draft guidance must be available for public comment and must be issued in final within nine months of PRIA 5 issuance. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 5:00 am by John Jascob
 The Commission noted in the release that it does not believe that an expansion of the exemption to include broker-dealers that provide broker-dealer services for more than a single would be appropriate. [read post]
25 Oct 2012, 8:28 am
Under the "per se" analysis, the state does not have to prove that the defendant was actually impaired. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 4:55 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
The Yankees won Game Five, 13-5. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 8:10 am by Daniel Shaviro
, (2) Why Luck Matters More Than You Might Think, (3) Does Inequality Matter? [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 1:00 pm by FM Librarian
(Immigration Impact Blog, 5 March 2018) [text]March 5 is Supposed to be the DACA “Deadline. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 9:54 am
If your entity does not already have these procedures in place, Wachler & Associates can help you implement these important compliance measures. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 4:00 am
  This ruling does not impact private party actions, criminal actions or actions by state or local agencies (Ohio EPA penalty or administrative actions are subject to a more liberal statute of limitations). [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 11:20 am
How does one know when to take the keys away from an elderly driver? [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 11:17 am by Employment Services
In this case, the claimant obtained work, but did not present sufficient evidence of an ongoing job search as required by OAC 4125-1-01(C)(5). [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 2:42 pm
  He states "The reality is that the primary structured settlement market does an outstanding job of predicting their client's needs 10, 20 even 30 years out or more. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 4:02 am by Walter Olson
Nonetheless, the California Supreme Court has now ruled 5-2 that the proposition does not ban such suits after all, because consumers can claim to be injured by the arguable mislabeling, even though nothing was defective about the lock. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 2:22 pm
September 5, 2007) (Pooler, Parker, Wesley, CJJ)Last term, the United States Supreme Court held that the exclusionary rule does not apply to violations of the Fourth Amendment's "knock-and-announce" rule. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 10:52 am
Youssef, No. 07-10335 (11-5-08). [read post]