Search for: "In re F. E." Results 4881 - 4900 of 7,240
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Nov 2011, 2:48 am by John L. Welch
The many examples of generic use by producers of coffee makers is strong evidence of the need by others in the trade to use the term generically and that it would be perceived as a generic term by consumers and commercial users alike.Mere descriptiveness and acquired distinctiveness: For the sake of completeness, the Board next considered the 2(e)(1) and 2(f) issues. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 1:50 pm by Geoffrey Rapp
Masteralexis, If you’re hurt, where is home? [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 12:45 pm by David Lat
“We can kowtow to the market and will hang you out as long as Cravath doesn’t announce, but if you’re 15 minutes late with your time entries, you’re f**ked. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 2:00 am by David Vasella
Mit den bestellten Produkten wurde überdies eine Broschüre versandt, die Heilwirkungen behauptete. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 6:58 am by David Vasella
Indessen ist das Erfordernis des Gegenrechts nicht allzu streng auszulegen: D'après la jurisprudence, cette exigence ne doit pas être interprétée avec une excessive sévérité; elle est réalisée lorsque le droit de l'Etat étranger reconnaît les effets d'une faillite étrangère dans une mesure sensiblement équivalente, et non à des conditions rigoureusement… [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 6:20 am by J
In summary, s.81, 1996 Act requires that, before any notice under s.146, Law of Property Act 1925 (forfeiture) can be served, or any right of re-entry exercised, there must be a "final determination" that the amount of the service charge is due. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 6:20 am by J
In summary, s.81, 1996 Act requires that, before any notice under s.146, Law of Property Act 1925 (forfeiture) can be served, or any right of re-entry exercised, there must be a "final determination" that the amount of the service charge is due. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 9:32 am by Matt Osenga
Re-Patenting In an issue previously addressed by IPWatchdog, there may be the opportunity to re-patent certain inventions that do not have 102(a)(1) prior art. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 5:17 am by Lawrence Douglas
  Now, however, scholars have begun the important task of re-assessing the NMT program, and in so doing, of rescuing it from its decades of comparative neglect. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 4:16 am by Alexandre Atheniense
Segundo ele, alguns tribunais não realizam o julgamento virtual, mas já recebem os votos dos colegas, opinam eletronicamente, e reúnem-se presencialmente apenas para homologar o que já fizeram. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 1:00 am by Stephanie Smith, Arden Chambers
  He disapproved of the practical effects of the rule but refrained from “jettisoning the certainty requirement” for six reasons: a) for centuries, the principal of certainty of term has been fundamental to the concept of a term of years; b) the 1925 Act defines a term of years as meaning “a term of years . . . either certain or liable to determination by notice or re-entry”: s 205(1) and the effect of s 149(6) is to convert a tenancy for life (which is of… [read post]