Search for: "JOHN DOE, 5"
Results 4881 - 4900
of 8,647
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am
Sander Greenland and others have raised various theoretical objections to the argument that relative risks should exceed two before attribution can be made in specific cases. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 12:07 am
“It does not stand up to criticism in terms of the methodology and the time over which the drug’s application was analyzed, and it does not answer the question regarding the drug’s accumulation in a human body. [read post]
31 May 2013, 6:33 pm
Secular Liberalism, the Theocratic State and the Political Consequences of Privileging Religion for Multi-Religious States Larry Catá Backer[1]Abstract: Religion has returned to the secular state; does crisis result? [read post]
31 May 2013, 12:15 pm
But does spelling matter? [read post]
31 May 2013, 12:15 pm
But does spelling matter? [read post]
30 May 2013, 2:06 pm
If Voltage thinks is can sue thousands of John and Jane does in one singles lawsuit, it is likely going to be disappointed, given that each case could present different facts and different defences. [read post]
29 May 2013, 10:07 am
Prenda Law is the copyright “troll” firm that gained fame for sending suing thousands of “John Doe” BitTorrent users identified by only IP address and, after obtaining their identities from their ISPs, would threaten them with a lawsuit if they did not pay up. [read post]
29 May 2013, 8:50 am
The typical mortality rate after this kind of diagnosis is 2-5 years. [read post]
28 May 2013, 11:57 pm
” Many thanks John for this thorough analysis! [read post]
28 May 2013, 7:21 pm
Why does it take a disruptive competitor to give consumers new services they want? [read post]
28 May 2013, 12:00 am
This is why this does not make sense to me. [read post]
26 May 2013, 6:58 pm
May 3-5, 2013. [read post]
23 May 2013, 5:11 pm
John Doe 5 Related Case: Malibu Media LLC v. [read post]
23 May 2013, 8:01 am
Prenda Law became a well known copyright “troll” for suing large groups of “John Doe” defendants accused of infringing copyrights on BitTorrent. [read post]
22 May 2013, 6:55 pm
Yoo, John H. [read post]
22 May 2013, 1:28 pm
Prenda, previously, had attempted to sue thousands of “John Doe” defendants identified only by their IP address but, when some defendants fought back, it was revealed that the organizations Prenda was supposedly representing were, most likely, shell companies for the lawyers themselves. [read post]
21 May 2013, 10:33 am
My rebuttal of Rawls is more nearly on the level of "his argument assumes that 2+2=5." [read post]
20 May 2013, 12:12 pm
The one that belonged to Chief Justice John G. [read post]
20 May 2013, 6:00 am
[5] Whatever proposals emerge from the overhaul, they would likely need to distinguish in some way between different forms of collection – e.g., between non-consensual surveillance of the words spoken in a telephone call between two American citizens in the United States, and the consensual monitoring of the telephone numbers dialed (but not the words spoken) in a call between two citizens of Afghanistan located in that country, or the mere physical surveillance of the Afghans… [read post]
