Search for: "State v. Sessions" Results 4881 - 4900 of 6,578
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2012, 2:30 pm by Joe Palazzolo
Clark, and John Marshall Harlan applauded when President Lyndon Johnson said, “let this session of Congress be known as the session which did more for civil rights than the last 100 sessions,” according to the study. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 6:45 am by Joshua Matz
At the San Jose Mercury News, Howard Mintz discusses United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 6:45 am by Joshua Matz
At the San Jose Mercury News, Howard Mintz discusses United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:00 am by INFORRM
Series of investigative films, followed by a Q&A session with the filmmakers. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 12:00 am
“In creating an international network of research universities, Washington University intends to develop a cohort of future leaders in a global university system and promote global awareness and social responsibility,” says McDonnell Academy Director James V. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 12:29 pm by Sara Hutchins Jodka
More than 70 House Republicans also have signed onto a resolution that would state Congressional dissatisfaction with President Obama’s actions. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 1:16 pm by Kevin Smith, J.D.
Today the Supreme Court issued a decision in the case of Golan v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 1:43 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Mattivi, for his part, calls attention to U.S. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 11:35 am by Lyle Denniston
  A post yesterday described this new redistricting dispute (Tennant, et al., v. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 6:00 am by Giesela Ruehl
Chinese courts will therefore be confronted with the demanding task of comparing the legal regimes of different states in this respect. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Series of investigative films, followed by a Q&A session with the filmmakers. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 7:05 am by Robin E. Shea
The plaintiff in Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 3:02 am by Aidan O'Neill QC, Matrix Chambers
The First Division stated in AXA [2011] CSIH 31 at para 89: “[89] That does not mean, in our view, that there are no circumstances in which the Court of Session could strike down on common law grounds legislation of the Scottish Parliament. [read post]