Search for: "Does 1 - 23"
Results 4901 - 4920
of 15,477
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Oct 2017, 8:56 am
Such immunity does not last long, though. [read post]
23 Mar 2022, 4:19 am
Notably, the recent USSC report indicates that the government formally moves for a below-range sentence in roughly 1 out of every 5 CP cases (p. 23); it is not clear if prosecutors made formal motions for departures or variances in Judge Jackson’s CP cases, but it is clear that in the majority of these cases the prosecutors were the ones who requested a sentence below the CP guidelines. [read post]
22 Apr 2018, 9:30 pm
” Regulating Within a Budget April 23, 2018 | Susan E. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 2:15 pm
The bill does not give Dreamers a path to citizenship. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 8:10 am
This suit was brought under the MCPA which expressly forbids class actions, so it is not similar to Rule 23 – and this isn’t a class action. [read post]
25 May 2015, 7:04 am
Distinguishing Content Services, the Court said in CarsOnTheWeb: “both the wording of Article 5(1) of Directive 97/7, which expressly requires the communication of information to consumers in a durable medium, and the objective of that provision, which is specifically consumer protection, differ from those of Article 23(2). [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 12:17 am
But with HB 2127 scheduled to go into effect on September 1, those protections will end just in time for a toasty fall for construction workers in both cities. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 5:15 pm
LEXIS 1594, *1-2 [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 2:53 pm
”Id. at *22-23. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 6:12 am
As a marketplace, a platform will be subject to requirements set out in NI 21-101, National Instrument 23-101 Trading Rules (together with NI 21-101, the “Marketplace Rules”), and National Instrument 23-103 Electronic Trading and Direct Access to Marketplaces. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 3:21 am
Displays Inc., 532 U.S. 23, 58 USPQ2d 1001, 1006 (2001) (quoting Inwood Labs., Inc. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 3:25 am
On 18th March 2021, Inver House Distillers Limited applied to revoke the proprietors’ mark on the grounds of non-use under Sections 46(1)(a) and 46(1)(b) of the UK Trade Marks Act 1994. [read post]
27 Dec 2020, 7:55 am
" On March 23, 2011, Flavorwire posted an article describing the Reflections series in which nine of the images are reproduced. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 9:39 am
The European trade marks system has permitted the use of disclaimer until the repealing of Regulation 207/2009 (as for 23 March 2016). [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 6:10 am
The slightly longer answer is:The term ‘product’ in Article 1.8 and Article 3(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1610/96 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 July 1996 concerning the creation of a supplementary protection certificate for plant protection products, and the term ‘active substances’ in Article 1.3 of that regulation, must be interpreted as meaning that those terms may cover a substance intended to be used as a safener, where that substance… [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 11:17 am
Int’l, Paper 23 at 3. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 9:52 pm
§§ 1338(a), 1295(a)(1). [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:55 pm
On 23 October 2020, VDS Czmyr Kowalik sp.k. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 12:41 am
The distinctiveness of a mark within the meaning of Article 7(1)(b) CTMR means that the mark serves to identify the origin of the goods or services of a certain undertaking, and therefore distinguishes those goods or services from those of other undertakings (see Smart Technologies, para 23). [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 9:21 am
The three-step test would be also part of such a mandate: the circumstance that a parody is made for profit does not rule out the very applicability of Article 70(1) of the Italian Act: what matters is not that circumstance, but rather whether the alleged parody unduly conflicts with the normal exploitation of the earlier work.If the approach indicated by the Italian Supreme Court was to be seen from an international law perspective, then an argument could plausibly be made that… [read post]
