Search for: "State v. Davi" Results 4901 - 4920 of 5,660
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2012, 2:24 pm by Kim Zetter
The exception comes from a 2011 Supreme Court case, Davis v. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 5:45 am by K.O. Herston
“If the Campbells had named their son ‘R2D2,’ state authorities would have intervened,” Carlton Larson, a law professor at the University of California, Davis wrote in a 2011 study of United States baby names. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 9:05 pm by Korinne Dunn
These states follow the logic of Marvin v. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 6:50 am
(Laurence Kaye on Digital Media Law)   United States US General David Kappos confirmed as USPTO Director (IP Watchdog) (Patently-O) (Anticipate This!) [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 7:07 am by Lyle Denniston
Thus, that type of program more closely implicates the federal campaign finance law’s “millionaire’s amendment,” which the Supreme Court struck down in 2008 in Davis v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 8:37 pm by Kevin LaCroix
While those cases still permeate state and federal courts, large event-driven litigation has become much more common than it was. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 7:45 pm by Jim Sedor
Nickie Mali Lum Davis pleaded guilty in 2020 to one count of aiding and abetting in violation of the Foreign Agents Registration Act. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 5:30 am by INFORRM
The UK Government has relaunched the campaign to overhaul the Human Rights Act 1998 in an attempt to counter what Secretary of State for Justice Dominic Raab has called “wokery and political correctness. [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 6:04 am
Gilson, Columbia University, and Alan Schwartz, Yale University, on Thursday, August 25, 2016 Tags: Airgas v. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 7:25 pm
(IP Osgoode)   United States US General IP outsourcing threatens national interest? [read post]
30 Apr 2017, 4:29 pm by INFORRM
  Lachaux v Independent Print, heard 29 and 30 November and 1 December 2016 (Macfarlane, Davis and Sharp LJJ). [read post]
15 Jan 2017, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
Peep Beep has also examined the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) judgement in the joint cases C‑203/15 Tele2 Sverige AB v Postoch telestyrelsen and C‑698/15 Secretary of State for the Home Department v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]