Search for: "State v. Saide" Results 4921 - 4940 of 57,119
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The ruling states that criminal suspects who want to exercise the “right to remain silent” promised to them by Miranda v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 3:51 am
Smoke breaks ruled off-duty activity Eckerson v State and Local Retirement Systems, 270 AD2d 705, motion for leave to appeal denied, 95 NY2d 756 Significant accidental disability retirement benefits are available to members of the New York State and Local Retirement Systems [ERS] who are disabled as the result of an accident incurred in performing official duties. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
First, the PHA states that a “person” may commit the criminal offence or be liable for the civil wrong of harassment (sections 1, 2 and 3). [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 1:20 pm by WIMS
      In a split decision, the majority affirmed the district court denial and said it "did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to intervene. [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 11:12 am
  He said that he'd been kidnapped by members of the Nueva Generación gang in Mexico, who cut off one of his fingers and sent it to his wife with a ransom demand. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 9:51 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, J.D., Ph.D.
 She explained that "the possibility that she might lose power of attorney over her mother was a major factor in her decision to sign off on the agreement"  (Chicago Tribune 1)  She stated:  "I don't like to be beaten down but I am," Janet Bedin said. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 12:00 pm by Dane Johnson
Although the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Schmerber v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 4:15 am by INFORRM
Article 10: The right to receive information Mr Sugar argued that he had the right to disclosure of the Report under Article 10 ECHR which he said recent Strasbourg case law made clear recognised a right of access to information (referring specifically to Matky v Czech Republic, Tarsasag v Hungary and Kenedi v Hungary). [read post]
4 May 2020, 7:12 am by Derek T. Muller
How individual district court judges handle these requests—how quickly, and with what kinds of appeals—remains deeply uncertain.That said, I don’t think RNC v. [read post]
26 May 2022, 8:47 am by Eric Goldman
Numerous opinions–all ignored by the court–have said the First Amendment protects the editorial discretion of search engines, including Search King, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 7:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
"The Second Circuit, noting that it must "construe pro se complaints “liberally and interpret them ‘to raise the strongest arguments that they suggest," said that "Cherry explicitly states that he was requesting the district court to vacate the judgment of the state administrative law judge. [read post]