Search for: "In The Matter Of: D.C"
Results 4941 - 4960
of 9,980
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2015, 7:20 pm
Obama, currently under submission in the D.C. [read post]
9 May 2015, 8:11 am
Yes, it is possible—likely, even—that the D.C. [read post]
8 May 2015, 11:14 am
For killers such as Timothy McVeigh, Ted Bundy or the D.C. [read post]
7 May 2015, 12:31 pm
Whether the police (in)action constitutes a crime also is a matter of dispute. [read post]
6 May 2015, 10:53 am
(That hardly matters to us, but since Eric Alexander insisted on a Mellencamp shout-out, we obliged.) [read post]
6 May 2015, 7:34 am
That's a matter of tradition and professional courtesy. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:26 pm
The Office of Medicaid now appears to take the position that all assets held in any Irrevocable Trust should be counted for MassHealth purposes, despite having regulations to the contrary. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:26 pm
The Office of Medicaid now appears to take the position that all assets held in any Irrevocable Trust should be counted for MassHealth purposes, despite having regulations to the contrary. [read post]
4 May 2015, 12:55 pm
For years the NFL franchise associated with Washington, D.C. has been a laughingstock on a number of fronts. [read post]
4 May 2015, 12:41 pm
He is a member of the California, D.C., and Virginia state bars. [read post]
4 May 2015, 8:01 am
Glockner said his SEC regional office is now freer to pursue a wider range of enforcement priorities now that much of the office’s work on financial crisis-related matters is done. [read post]
4 May 2015, 4:47 am
Grocery Manufacturers Assoc. v. [read post]
1 May 2015, 12:02 pm
Like the Ninth Circuit opinion in Spokeo, The D.C. [read post]
1 May 2015, 9:45 am
Washington, D.C. - The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit heard an appeal in the matter of Ineos USA LLC v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 10:46 am
Fishman, a frequent contributor to Federal Employment Law Insider and attorney with Fortney & Scott, LLC in Washington, D.C., said of the ruling in Mach Mining v. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 11:56 am
I have no comment on the matter. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 11:39 pm
” Applying Supreme Court teaching to the THANN example, the soap carton has the potential for immediate protection as inherently distinctive product packaging, while the soap bar shape, no matter how unique, can never obtain immediate protection because it can never be considered inherently distinctive, proof of acquired distinctiveness is necessary before any exclusive rights can attach. [read post]
26 Apr 2015, 10:02 pm
Butz, a 1974 decision of the D.C. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
The first edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence [Manual] was published in 1994, a year after the Supreme Court delivered its opinion in Daubert. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 6:51 am
The courts ultimately said “no,” see Abigail Alliance v. von Eschenbach, 495 F.3d 695 (D.C. [read post]
