Search for: "State v. Save"
Results 4961 - 4980
of 11,761
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
Ninth Circuit’s Pro-PAGA Decision Is Not the Death Knell for Class Waivers in Arbitration Agreements
1 Oct 2015, 7:34 pm
The decision appears contrary to the United States Supreme Court holding in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 12:14 pm
Sakkab v. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 11:50 am
On September 28, 2015, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a 2-1 decision in the long-awaited case of Sakkab v. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 7:01 am
The decision in Gordon v. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 12:08 am
Hefti v. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 6:03 am
Citing AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 10:00 am
In Sakkab v. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 4:00 am
A political subdivision of the State may provide for the defense and indemnification of its officers and employees sued in state or federal court involving the performance of official duties Bonilla v Town of Hempstead, 2015 NY Slip Op 06916, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentFormer Hempstead Town Clerk Mark A. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 11:26 pm
Apple's lawyers mentioned that after last year's trial (in the second California Apple v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 2:10 pm
Along with the direct investigation and enforcement activities by DOL, DOL’s educational outreach also are adding fuel to private litigation and demands based on alleged wage and hour, overtime and other FLSA and state minimum wage and overtime laws. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 1:06 pm
The federal district court’s decision last week (Issa v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
Wiretap Act (also known as Title III) prohibits the interception of a live communication (e.g., a telephone call) only if the interception occurs in the United States; it does not prohibit or regulate wiretaps (interception) conducted abroad.[8] Similarly, the U.S. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 5:00 am
VanderKam v. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 3:59 am
" In Lands' End Inc. v. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 5:24 am
. neither an express pre-emption provision nor a saving clause bars the ordinary working of conflict pre-emption principles.Id. at 352 (quoting Geier v. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 1:54 pm
From yesterday’s Wisconsin Court of Appeals decision in State v. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 12:38 pm
The scuttled measure would have required social media users to save their outgoing content for a period of 90 days. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 7:00 am
” Hirshman repeatedly describes O’Connor’s opinions on the Court as “tightfisted,” and she laments that, “[o]f all the hurdles the states thought up to discourage women in the years from her first abortion decision in 1983 to [Planned Parenthood v.] [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 3:50 am
State v. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 2:37 am
(d) A member state can refuse “social benefits to economically inactive Union citizens who exercise their right to freedom of movement solely in order to obtain another Member State’s social assistance although they do not have sufficient resources to claim a right of residence”: Dano v Jobcenter Leipzig C-133/13, [78]. [read post]
