Search for: "American Federation of Government Employees v. United States" Results 481 - 500 of 1,886
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2018, 4:19 am by Edith Roberts
 The justices also held unanimously in United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 7:07 am
 The Solicitor General was also invited to file a brief expressing the views of the United States in Thompson v. [read post]
24 Dec 2019, 3:12 pm
A young lawyer named John Roberts spearheaded this effort, so it is no surprise that, as chief justice of the United States, he has helped enshrine this warped conception of the FAA into law. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 4:26 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which asks how fully a judge must explain a sentencing modification. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 9:24 am by Maureen Johnston
American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees Council 79 13-841Issue: (1) Whether a state may, consistent with the Fourth Amendment, condition government employment on an employee or job applicant’s consent to suspicionless drug testing; and (2) whether suspicionless drug testing of all government employees and job applicants is reasonable under the “special needs” exception to the… [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 11:26 am by Eugene Volokh
After Smith, religious exemptions began to be seen as a bipartisan matter: A broad coalition -- including a vast range of religious groups (liberal and conservative) as well as the ACLU, Americans United for Separation of Church and State, People for the American Way, and the American Humanist Association -- urged Congress to adopt the RFRA in 1993; RFRA, which passed nearly unanimously, was spearheaded in the Senate by Republican Senator Orrin Hatch and… [read post]
9 Mar 2022, 9:03 am by Alvaro Marañon
 The United States also has an interest in ensuring that the benefits of financial innovation are enjoyed equitably by all Americans and that any disparate impacts of financial innovation are mitigated. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 7:03 am by Joy Waltemath
But the court was not convinced, noting that “the fact that a person outside the United States may be a `whistleblower’ under Dodd-Frank does not compel the conclusion he is protected by the Anti-Retaliation Provision. [read post]
5 Oct 2012, 4:00 am by Robin E. Shea
The fourth employment case involves which court should hear the claim of discrimination and retaliation claims brought by a federal government employee. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 10:43 pm
Hartford is guarding against employee and client defections after three consecutive quarterly losses depleted capital and a $3.4 billion U.S. bailout raised the prospect of government- imposed compensation curbs. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 8:30 am by WOLFGANG DEMINO
Dispute Resolution; Governing Law (a) The exclusive venue for any action in respect of Section 13 of this Retention Plan shall be the state and Federal courts located in Harris County, Texas. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 8:30 am by WOLFGANG DEMINO
Dispute Resolution; Governing Law (a) The exclusive venue for any action in respect of Section 13 of this Retention Plan shall be the state and Federal courts located in Harris County, Texas. [read post]