Search for: "Childs v. State"
Results 481 - 500
of 20,968
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Dec 2023, 10:00 pm
When a personal-injury case was brought against them, the defendants moved for summary judgment – pretrial relief in their favor, claiming that the child didn’t suffer a “serious injury,” as defined by the state’s Insurance Law. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 3:43 am
ECOWASThe Incorporated Trustees of Expression Now Human Rights Initiative v. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 3:25 pm
The airbag may not deploy in a collision if a child is found in the front passenger seat because its force could harm a young child. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 12:30 pm
But officials broke "[v]irtually every promise" they made. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
Part of the GGC’s stated vision during the election was support for “evidence-based” governance. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 8:09 pm
., State v. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 2:31 pm
"] From Elden v. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 10:27 am
Lenz v. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 7:51 am
Yesterday’s unsealed opinion in United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
The parents may have lived together before or after the birth of the child but may no longer do so by reason of separation or divorce. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 12:22 pm
Department of Family & Community Services (Indian Child Welfare Act) Billy Zane Deo v. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 6:03 am
From Doe v. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
Brackeen, the Court upheld the Indian Child Welfare Act and I admit several of the justices did use origi [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
”As for the purported travel restrictions, the AD1 agreed that it was up to the State Department (not the courts) to remove any restrictions on his passport, so that the father could return to the United States.Apparently, his arguments didn’t travel well, either.# # #DECISIONVelin M. v Bermet T. [read post]
17 Dec 2023, 10:00 pm
” (It also didn’t help her case that this “serious incident” wasn’t properly reported.)Given that factual backdrop, the AD1 didn’t think the revocation was an inappropriate penalty and left the outcome undisturbed.Unfortunately, there's no revoking that.# # #DECISIONMatter of C.L. v New York State Off. of Children & Family Servs [read post]
16 Dec 2023, 4:17 pm
From Murry v. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 12:30 pm
Under the Supreme Court's ruling in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 9:00 am
That’s why the court’s decision in Counterman v. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 8:44 am
Craigslist * Facebook Still Can’t Dismiss Sex Trafficking Victims’ Lawsuit in Texas State Court * Craigslist Denied Section 230 Immunity for Classified Ads from 2008–ML v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 7:47 am
Bank National Association v Langner, 168 AD3d 1021 [2d Dept 2019])” The Court observed that CPLR § 2309 sets forth the way oaths and affirmations are to be administered and notes in section (c) regarding oaths and affirmations taken without the state: An oath or affirmation taken without the state shall be treated as if taken within the state if it is accompanied by such certificate or certificates as would be required to entitle a deed acknowledged… [read post]
