Search for: "Elliott v. Elliott" Results 481 - 500 of 759
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2023, 11:48 am by Mark Walsh
Elliott for historical correctness, but the issue is a bit complex and the court likely had several reasons for putting the Kansas case first. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 10:49 am by utahdefenders
Elliott, 107 F.3d 810, 814 (10th Cir.1997) (quoting United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 4:00 am by Colin Lachance
When you read R. v. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 2:24 am by INFORRM
On 14 October 2015, HHJ Graham Wood QC gave judgment in the case of Elliott v Staffordshire Police dismissing a slander claim arising out of comments made in a child protection conference. [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 11:00 pm by Adam Wagner
Morley & Ors, R. v [2010] EW Misc 9 (EWCC) (11 June 2010) – Read judgment Four former Members of Parliament have failed in their initial bid to claim parliamentary privilege in criminal proceedings arising from the parliamentary expenses scandal. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts On 24 March 2015 Warby J handed down judgment in the case of Rufus v Elliott ([2015] EWHC 807 (QB)). [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 2:29 am by INFORRM
Northern Ireland A libel claim by the Attorney-General of Northern Ireland, John Larkin QC, against a former UUP leader, Tom Elliott has been settled. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 3:52 pm
In Jacob LJ’s lead judgment, the precedents were considered - the main point taken from Peabody Donation Fund Governors v Grant [1982] 2 EGLR 37 CA, Swanbrae Ltd v Elliott (1987) 19 HLR 86 CA and Hildebrand v Moon (1990) 22 HR 1 CA was that ‘resides with’ carrys the meaning of ‘making their home there’ (Swanbrae), ‘more than live at’ (Swanbrae), ‘having made a home there (Hildebrand). [read post]