Search for: "In Interest of CT" Results 481 - 500 of 8,995
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Mar 2017, 3:28 pm
 Who largely wins his appeal today, in a very significant family law case.An interesting set of facts and an interesting, and lengthy, opinion. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 7:25 pm
That's an important -- and interesting -- holding, and does conflict a tiny bit (albeit in an arguably distinguishable way) with some other holdings.But let me focus less on the doctrinal merits here than on a passage in the opinion that quotes some of the dialogue below. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 4:13 pm
  Arguing that the low-earner should receive support as long as it wasn't inconsistent with the interests of the children. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 3:27 am by Peter Mahler
LLC v Amedore Concord, LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 50152(U) [Sup Ct Albany County Jan. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 3:27 am by Peter Mahler
LLC v Amedore Concord, LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 50152(U) [Sup Ct Albany County Jan. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 6:39 pm by SOIssues
In 2008, a girl who had just turned four showed an interest in another child's rear end. [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 3:42 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
CT Miami claims that Akerman had a preexisting relationship with FTI and was interested in maintaining that relationship to the detriment of CT Miami (id., 32-33). [read post]
An interesting decision addressing standing issues arising in the context of a family battle over an 87-year old parent's assets was issued by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on February 21, 2017. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 3:27 pm
Pretty interesting stuff.Media reports today blame the usual suspects: cultural shifts, media influence, etc. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 7:10 am
  Target declined Party A’s proposal, which demonstrated an interest in acquiring target’s common stock for $58.00 per share. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 12:30 pm
The panel said that since the parties separated in 1996, and all the fraud happened thereafter -- and didn't actively involve the wife -- maybe she's an innocent spouse and in the interests of justice her interest in the LLC shouldn't be attached.Maybe. [read post]