Search for: "In Re Peter M." Results 481 - 500 of 2,185
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2019, 3:54 am
Two of the Section 2(d) decisions were precedential, involving the marks I'M SMOKING HOT and AMERICAN CONSTELLATION: In re FabFitFun, Inc., 127 USPQ2d 1670 (TTAB 2018) [precedential] (Opinion by Judge Peter W. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 9:25 pm by Chuck Cosson
  If something does go wrong, I’m likely at a loss as to how to fix it. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 5:59 pm by Florian Mueller
Ericsson sought to position itself as a reasonable SEP licensor (I've repeatedly criticized Ericsson on this blog, but they're not the worst for sure) who understands every SEP holder has to consider he doesn't own the standard alone "in order for the system to work. [read post]
5 Jan 2019, 3:06 pm by familoo
I’m very alive (thanks to respectful challenge from engaged outsiders to the system like Louise) of how it looks to litigants. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 5:48 am by Quinta Jurecic, Benjamin Wittes
But as the hearing wore on, the judge looked more and more like the judge featured in the song, who triumphs: “I’m a federal judge and I’m smarter than you—for all my life. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 6:27 am by Shu-Yi Oei
This year, I’m the chair of the AALS Tax Section. [read post]