Search for: "MATTER OF J L S A D S"
Results 481 - 500
of 1,948
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2020, 11:17 pm
In 1944, New York’s highest court, the Court of Appeals, held, in a silicosis personal injury case, that: “[i]t is a matter of common knowledge that it is injurious to the lungs and dangerous to health to work in silica dust, a fact which defendant was bound to know. [read post]
3 Jul 2020, 9:22 am
Together, they extend the immigrant visa ban and bar the entry of foreign citizens requiring work visas in the H-1B, H-2B, L-1, and many J-1 categories along with their dependents (the June Bans) until the end of 2020. [read post]
3 Jul 2020, 9:22 am
Together, they extend the immigrant visa ban and bar the entry of foreign citizens requiring work visas in the H-1B, H-2B, L-1, and many J-1 categories along with their dependents (the June Bans) until the end of 2020. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 8:02 am
Trump, III and Mary L. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 5:39 am
In view of your opinion of J. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 5:02 am
Code § 94874(d)(1) (exempting test preparation courses for standard examinations), (d)(2) (exempting test preparation courses for continuing education or license examinations), (j) (exempting flight instruction courses). [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 2:11 pm
Here is the Board’s 2017 decision – released about five years after this matter first arose and after more than three years of deliberation. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 1:17 am
”[10] Since a case cannot be brought unless the plaintiff has first been diagnosed with a compensable condition, the court’s conclusion as a practical matter means that Utah plaintiffs must first be diagnosed by Utah physicians, or at least by a physician with a current temporary or other license to practice in the state. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 9:29 am
In the course of the trial judge’s judgment, she commented that: Justice Major writing for the dissent (Lamer C.J., Sopinka J., and Major J.) stated that the appeal should not be decided on questions of racism but instead on how courts decide cases. [read post]
29 May 2020, 4:06 pm
Walker (D. [read post]
29 May 2020, 5:40 am
Peregrine and David S. [read post]
28 May 2020, 5:29 am
” For example, in the notorious Milward case, the First Circuit, citing legally invalid pre-Daubert decisions, stated that “when the factual underpinning of an expert’s opinion is weak it is a matter affecting the weight and credibility of the testimony − a question to be resolved by the jury. [read post]
14 May 2020, 6:03 am
Hickok (Pepper Hamilton LLP), on Thursday, May 14, 2020 Editor's Note: J. [read post]
11 May 2020, 2:13 pm
The committee will hear testimony from the Solarium's co-chairs—Sen. [read post]
11 May 2020, 10:57 am
Intercont’l Grp. [read post]
8 May 2020, 6:57 pm
J. [read post]
7 May 2020, 1:06 pm
L. [read post]
5 May 2020, 12:06 pm
And So what’s a tax credit? [read post]
4 May 2020, 12:03 pm
Such a disapproval vote must be filed with Connecticut’s secretary of state within 72 hours of the governor’s announcement to take effect. [read post]
4 May 2020, 9:33 am
The ICAP Staff Attorney 1 will work closely with ICAP's other attorneys engaged in factual development, legal research, writing, and case presentation in support of ICAP's litigation efforts. [read post]
