Search for: "MATTER OF RULES OF EVIDENCE" Results 481 - 500 of 41,971
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2022, 5:01 am by Chris Carpenter
But in terms of the Federal Rules of Evidence (FRE) Rule 901 on authenticating evidence, this is a nightmare. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 7:35 pm by Judge Bonnie Sudderth
Prior to 1999, courthouses across Texas were running out of storage space for the voluminous discovery documents which were being filed in civil cases, particularly in complex litigation matters. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 6:47 am
However, he failed to properly submit the registration into evidence, and the Board rejected his other proffered evidence as inadmissible under the hearsay rule. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 5:35 am by Woodruff Family Law Group
Simply put, it does not matter how many other boxes are checked in the legal process, failure to meet the requirements under Rule 4 will keep your case on the sidelines until they are met. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 2:09 pm by HR Hero
Edwards On January 1, 2011, new rules for the discovery (pretrial exchange of evidence) of electronically stored information went into effect in Wisconsin. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 8:42 pm
  Also, while the Rules of Professional Conduct are not the basis for a tort claim, compliance vel non is probative evidence. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 10:28 am by Hanlon Law, PA
The conviction should be affirmed if the prosecution failed to provide evidence that the jury can use to rule out all reasonable hypotheses except for guilt. [read post]
11 May 2010, 2:22 pm by Dwight Sullivan
The rule requires a party to explain in a motion why the Court may consider the evidence although it was not considered previously and is not part of the record. [read post]
The Arkansas Supreme Court recently issued a ruling that struck down a state statute restricting the admissibility of seat-belt non-use evidence in an auto accident lawsuit, finding the rule was unconstitutional under the Arkansas constitution. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 6:38 am
Similar to its federal counterpart, Arkansas Rule of Evidence 606(b) indicates that Upon an inquiry into the validity of a verdict or indictment, a juror may not testify as to any matter or statement occurring during the course of the... [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 9:03 am by Evidence ProfBlogger
Like its federal counterpart, Minnesota Rule of Evidence 606(b) provides that Upon an inquiry into the validity of a verdict or indictment, a juror may not testify as to any matter or statement occurring during the course of the jury's... [read post]
3 Sep 2011, 7:11 am by Evidence ProfBlogger
Similar to its federal counterpart, Colorado Rule of Evidence 606(b) provides that Upon an inquiry into the validity of a verdict or indictment, a juror may not testify as to any matter or statement occurring during the course of the... [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 4:12 am by Evidence ProfBlogger
Similar to its federal counterpart, Wyoming Rule of Evidence 606(b) provides that Upon an inquiry into the validity of a verdict or indictment, a juror may not testify as to any matter or statement occurring during the course of the... [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 9:37 am by Evidence ProfBlogger
Similar to its federal counterpart, Alaska Rule of Evidence 606(b) provides that Upon an inquiry into the validity of a verdict or indictment, a juror may not be questioned as to any matter or statement occurring during the course of... [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 6:28 am
Like its federal counterpart, Colorado Rule of Evidence 606(b) provides that Upon an inquiry into the validity of a verdict or indictment, a juror may not testify as to any matter or statement occurring during the course of the jury's... [read post]
25 Dec 2010, 8:47 am by Evidence ProfBlogger
This is the basis for Federal Rule of Evidence 606(b), which provides that Upon an inquiry into the validity of a verdict or indictment, a juror may not testify as to any matter or... [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 3:49 pm by Evidence ProfBlogger
Similar to its federal counterpart, Texas Rule of Evidence 606(b) provides that Upon an inquiry into the validity of a verdict or indictment, a juror may not testify as to any matter or statement occurring during the jury's deliberations, or... [read post]