Search for: "Nichols v. Nichols" Results 481 - 500 of 857
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2010, 9:12 am by Steve Hall
The Court's 4-3 ruling in Weis v. [read post]
6 Feb 2016, 7:29 am by Alex R. McQuade
Alex Loomis provided a summary brief on Simon v. [read post]
27 May 2011, 6:40 am by INFORRM
As the Court of Appeal in McKennitt v Ash ([2006] EWCA Civ 1714)remarked, “A v B cannot be read as any sort of binding authority on the content of articles 8 and 10. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
Nicholls 1999 CanLII 2750 (ON CA), (1999), 139 C.C.C. (3d) 253 (Ont. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 6:18 am by Terry Hart
This principle was explained most notably by Judge Learned Hand in the 1930 case Nichols v Universal Pictures: It is of course essential to any protection of literary property, whether at common-law or under the statute, that the right cannot be limited literally to the text, else a plagiarist would escape by immaterial variations. [read post]
15 May 2013, 10:47 am
In holding this to unpatentable, Nicholls LJ stated at 327 that “his program makes a more efficient use of a computer's resources. [read post]
17 Aug 2013, 3:11 pm by Schachtman
We can find no clearer statement of judicial antipathy to expert witness advocacy than the famous copyright decision by Judge Learned Hand in Nichols v. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
On 21 November the Court of Appeal delivered a major decision on the statutory public interest defence for defamation claims, in the case of Alexander Economou v David de Freitas [2018] EWCA Civ 2591. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 1:59 am by INFORRM
Bannerjee: “In my judgment, this case bears no resemblance to the cases that Lord Nicholls had in mind as exceptional. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 4:01 pm by INFORRM
He referred to the speech of Lord Nicholls in Tse Wai Chun Paul v Albert Cheng [2001] E.M.L.R. 31. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 7:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
[McGunigle v City of Quency, USCA, First Circuit, Docket # 15-2224.] [read post]