Search for: "Patel v. State" Results 481 - 500 of 564
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Sep 2012, 5:54 pm by Brian Shiffrin
United States, 395 U.S. 6, 33, 89 S.Ct. 1532, 1546, 23 L.Ed.2d 57;  Tot v. [read post]
22 May 2022, 4:38 pm by Katherine Pompilio
  Kurup and Pompilio posted the Supreme Court’s ruling in Patel v. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 5:55 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
Radhakrishnan v Maestro Engineers (dispute involving  allegations of fraud cannot be arbitrated) and proceeds on merits. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 11:35 am by Jonathan Shaub
And there is no doubt Meadows, Scavino, Patel, and others, like Trump’s Justice Department ally Jeffrey Clark, are watching carefully what happens with Bannon—who, unlike the other three, was not a government employee during the time at issue. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 7:33 am by Joy Waltemath
Here, the court found that allegations that a combination of long hours and unjustified deductions from pay resulted in a wage below that allowed by Massachusetts law were not so threadbare or speculative that they failed to state a plausible claim upon which relief can be based (Patel v. 7-Eleven, Inc., July 20, 2018, Gorton, N.). [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Miller, Patel, and McCarthy have been viewed as crucial witnesses for understanding government’s response to the assault and former President Trump’s reaction to the breach. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 7:23 am by Paul Rosenzweig
  Such legislation would almost certainly pass constitutional muster: Under South Dakota v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 5:21 am by Andrew Hamm
For the New York Times, Alicia Parlapiano and Jugal Patel present visual graphics leading to a similar conclusion. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 8:08 am
U.S. 7th Circuit Court of Appeals, February 04, 2008 State of Wisconsin v. [read post]
10 May 2022, 5:55 pm by Riana Pfefferkorn
With the Supreme Court poised to rip away a constitutional right that’s been the law of the land for nearly half a century by overturning Roe v. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 5:04 pm by INFORRM
The academic filed a libel action against the Minister after Donelan wrote a letter to the UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) encouraging it to dismiss Sang and fellow academic Dr Kamna Patel from an expert advisory group on equality, diversity and inclusion. [read post]
15 Jan 2017, 4:30 am by Barry Sookman
Bell Canada, 2017 FC 6 https://t.co/Z80SOcWu44 -> Big win for Bell in major patent case, Mediatube Corp. v. [read post]