Search for: "Quick v. Department of Justice" Results 481 - 500 of 676
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2013, 2:56 pm by Andrew F. Sellars
Like so many around the greater Berkman community I was stunned and saddened to hear that Aaron Swartz committed suicide late last week. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 2:38 am by Russell Beck
Now, as reported by CBS, the DOJ is at it again: “Justice Department sues eBay over non-compete agreement. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 7:07 am by Charles Johnson
SILENCE By the time you read this material, you or your loved one will have already entered the Federal Criminal Justice System. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:31 am by Molly Joyce
The Justices in Jennings were quick to acknowledge that even if Broome did not violate the SCA, her alleged actions weren’t necessarily acceptable either. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 4:02 pm
As you know, the Justice Department has filed a number of suits in states that have enacted voter identification laws. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 12:54 am
It is possible to have a UK approach to justice in a quick, efficient manner. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 4:38 pm
It is possible to have a UK approach to justice in a quick, efficient manner. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 12:54 pm by Roy Ginsburg
Department of Justice investigated allegations of such agreements among a number of high-tech companies that restricted their ability to hire each other’s employees. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 5:57 am by Rob Robinson
Follow @InfoGovernance   eDiscovery News Content and Considerations 2nd Circuit Rejects Key Litigation Hold Standard - http://bit.ly/NFI9EM (John Jablonski) A Quick Forensics Lesson: The Smart Phone Is Much More than Just a Hard Drive - http://bit.ly/Q1N9tR (Greg Buckles) An Uncertain Standard for Cost Shifting Can Restore a Level Playing Field - http://bit.ly/NgYZxk (Matthew Prewitt) Are Seed Sets the New Keyword? [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 1:35 am
A quick summary of the new Fostering for Adoption proposals by suesspiciousminds.When assets aren’t divided 50:50. [read post]