Search for: "RAY v. STATE" Results 481 - 500 of 1,929
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2020, 1:17 am by Schachtman
Ray Harron, did not have a patient-physician relationship such that a patient injured as a result of the screening could sue him for malpractice.[13] The plaintiff had received a chest X-ray in a mass screening that resulted from a law firm solicitation. [read post]
26 Dec 2021, 8:12 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
A recent Court of Appeal for Ontario decision McLean v. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 6:50 am by Amy Howe
Yesterday’s second argument was in United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 11:00 am by Katherine Gallo
Washington (1942, CA5 La) 128 F2d 466 [x-ray examination using lipoidol]; Riss & Co. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 12:09 pm by Ortiz Law Firm
Sutton then filed this case in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 5:12 am
In Florida state courts expert testimony is governed by sections 90.702-90.706, Florida Statutes. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 3:17 pm by NARF
Seminole Gaming (Tribal Sovereign Immunity) Ray v. [read post]