Search for: "Res-Care, Inc. v. United States" Results 481 - 500 of 1,136
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2013, 11:00 am by Michelle Yeary
United States, 335 U.S. 345 (1950) (“One article or thing is accompanied by another when it supplements or explains it . . . [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 8:07 am by Michael Grossman
In the event of a work injury, they’re the ones who are on the hook for making sure their worker is taken care of. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 2:48 pm by John Elwood
United States, 17-778, United States v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
United States (Copyright Litigation Blog) (Property, intangible)   US Trade Marks – Decisions Precedential No. 7: TTAB deems internet printouts admissible via notice of reliance: Safer, Inc v OMS Investments, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB vacates 2008 fraud ruling in Herbaceuticals, Inc v Xel Pharmaceuticals, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB affirms 2(d) refusal of CARMINE’S design for restaurant services in view of two other… [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
United States (Copyright Litigation Blog) (Property, intangible)   US Trade Marks – Decisions Precedential No. 7: TTAB deems internet printouts admissible via notice of reliance: Safer, Inc v OMS Investments, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB vacates 2008 fraud ruling in Herbaceuticals, Inc v Xel Pharmaceuticals, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB affirms 2(d) refusal of CARMINE’S design for restaurant services in view of two other… [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 6:10 pm by Marty Lederman
  In support of this argument, Mooppan and CSS lawyer Lori Windham repeatedly cited Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 6:19 am by John Elwood
============================================================ Granted Relists Coventry Health Care of Missouri, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 11:58 am
Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 2014 WL 1335511 (Pa. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 10:09 am by Don Cruse
Gambling machines STATE OF TEXAS v. $1,760.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY, 37 "8" LINER MACHINES, No. 12-0718 Per Curiam The Court agreed with the State that certain “eight-liner” machines qualified as gambling equipment for purposes of civil forfeiture. [read post]