Search for: "Say v. Baker"
Results 481 - 500
of 1,402
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2017, 5:42 am
Sims and Baker v. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 2:48 pm
Justice Harlan was dissenting from the Court’s decision in Baker v. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 11:14 am
Vanessa Sauter flagged an amicus brief from Orin Kerr submitted in Carpenter v. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 8:20 am
This is the second in a series about Gill v. [read post]
30 Sep 2017, 5:39 am
Sauter posted the government's reply brief in Carpenter v. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 11:47 am
Sauter posted the government's reply brief in Carpenter v. [read post]
23 Sep 2017, 11:16 am
Supreme Court on whether a baker may refuse to serve a gay couple because the baker sees his practice as art, therefore arguing that the government cannot compel him to say something he does not agree with. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 2:56 pm
In today’s case (Tani v. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 4:28 am
” At Lawfare, Steve Vladeck looks at Dalmazzi v. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 9:01 pm
Co. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 3:30 am
And then the DOJ took a heel turn in Zarda v. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 7:24 am
” The cakeshop and DOJ rely heavily on Hurley v. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 3:27 pm
It follows then that just as a state could not forbid bakers from baking cakes to celebrate same-sex wedding ceremonies, a state cannot force a baker to bake a cake in order to celebrate one. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 11:17 am
The Supreme Court stayed the Ninth Circuit’s September 7 decision in Hawaii v. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 7:33 am
The Supreme Court held in Employment Division v. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 4:19 am
” At ElectionLaw@Moritz, Edward Foley discusses Gill v. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 7:18 am
In Obergefell v. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 12:31 pm
Beyer’s forthcoming article Estate Planning Ramifications of Obergefell v. [read post]
10 Sep 2017, 9:05 pm
Department of Justice (Sept. 7) have both weighed in with amicus briefs in the Supreme Court’s fall-term case of Masterpiece Cakeshop Ltd. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 9:11 am
Baker, suggesting that a certain set of studies is not worthy of consideration because it was “litigant-funded. [read post]
