Search for: "ADAMS v. ADAMS" Results 4981 - 5000 of 8,025
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2021, 12:18 pm by Christiana Wayne
The Supreme Court upheld Arizona voting restrictions in Brnovich v. [read post]
18 Jun 2022, 1:23 pm by Benjamin Pollard
Jolynn Dellinger and Stephanie Pell argued that if Roe v. [read post]
14 Mar 2018, 3:01 pm by Cameron Kerry
In any event, the nomination of Adam Klein to chair the PCLOB is now awaiting a Senate vote. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 12:50 pm
 DDR Holdings v Hotels.com is a fascinating post-Alice case on US patent-eligibility, involving an invention directed towards merchandising on the internet: David Berry writes it up for PatLit here. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 10:22 am
[If you want some handy tips on how to speed-read all those comments, try the Wired How-To Wiki, here] In case you missed it, Eli Lilly and Company v Human Genome Sciences, Inc UKSC 2012/0220 is not going on appeal to the United Kingdom's Supreme Court. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 10:39 am
Schill, The Sixth Path: Reforming Investment Law from Within Adam Raviv, Achieving a Faster ICSID Joongi Kim, Streamlining the ICSID Process: New Statistical Insights and Comparative Lessons from Other Institutions Jeffrey Sullivan & David Ingle, Interim Costs Orders: The Tribunal’s Tool to Encourage Procedural Economy Matthew Hodgson, Costs in Investment Treaty Arbitration: The Case for Reform Mark Feldman, Distinguishing Investors from Exporters under Investment Treaties … [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 2:00 am
Orr-Adams (trading as Applied Concrete Systems, a Partnership) v Bailey (trading as G Bailey Services) [2013] EWPCC 30 is a Patents Count Court decision of Katfriend and long-time IP enthusiast Miss Recorder Amanda Michaels last Tuesday, 19 May. [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 12:26 pm by Marty Lederman
“Bill” Priestap, Sarah Raskin, Steve Ricchetti, Susan Rice, Rod Rosenstein, Gabriel Sanz-Rexach, Nathan Sheets, Elizabeth Sherwood-Randall, Glenn Simpson, Steve Somma, Peter Strzok, Michael Sussman, Adam Szubin, Jonathan Winer, Christopher Wray, and Sally Yates.According to both President Trump (in his personal capacity) and the Solicitor General of the United States, this Judiciary Committee investigation is unconstitutional, and therefore recipients of the subpoenas need not… [read post]
3 Apr 2016, 12:30 am by Emily Prifogle
Williams discusses Defenders of the Unborn: The Pro-Life Movement Before Roe v. [read post]