Search for: "JAMES V. STATE" Results 4981 - 5000 of 10,687
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2015, 5:31 am by Amy Howe
In Arizona Legislature v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 7:34 am by Schachtman
United States[13], the district court refused to enforce plaintiff’s Rule 45 subpoena that sought documents from defendant’s expert witness. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:18 pm by James E. Novak, P.L.L.C.
Thus, holding that the Arizona Constitution affords greater protections in some circumstances citing Arizona v. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
United States A jury is considering the merits of a $850 million libel claim in the case of Bouveng v Wey. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 3:13 pm by Mark Walsh
” He goes on, in an eloquent vein, not the more businesslike tone he took with his announcement in United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:38 pm by J
In Issa v Hackney London Borough Council (1997) 29 H.L.R. 640, the court noted that the failure to update s.8 left tenants  …wholly without remedy in the civil courts against their landlords, however grievously their health may have suffered because they are living in damp, unfit conditions… Likewise, in Habinteg Housing Association v James (1994) 27 HLR 299: We are told that the Law Commission has been considering such a problem. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm by John Elwood
United States, 14-419, before it), Umaña v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm by John Dean
Editor’s Note: This is the second of two columns on James Robenalt’s January 1973: Watergate, Roe v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 9:21 am by Mark Walsh
Bonauto of Gay & Lesbian Advocates and Defenders is here again today, as is James D. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 11:36 am
(Reuters/Joshua Roberts) Below is a guest post by James Blumstein, university professor of constitutional law and health law and policy at Vanderbilt Law School and director of the Vanderbilt Health Policy Center, discussing why the procedural posture of King v. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 4:30 am
  Examples of both such highs and such lows reside in the recent case of Ezeb v. [read post]