Search for: "Leaders v. State" Results 4981 - 5000 of 7,105
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2020, 12:13 pm by Matthew Kahn
The Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 9:30 pm by Mitra Sharafi
Red terror pushed the legitimised violence of the new state to the extremes. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 8:02 pm
These purported leaders wrongfully hold themselves out to be the leaders of "The Corporation of The Episcopal Diocese of Fort Worth" and are wrongfully doing business as the Diocesan Corporation. . . . [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
Pierre, who is the leader of the opposition, has been successful in two separate libel cases. [read post]
1 May 2009, 11:00 am
: In re Kubin and KSR International Co v Teleflex Inc (Patent Docs)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC: USPTO, Tafas & GSK request extension for reconsideration (IP Watchdog) CAFC: Patent on sex aid is obvious: Ritchie v Vast Resources (AKA Topco) (Patently-O) (Hal Wegner) CAFC: Assigning patent rights: Euclid Chemical v Vector Corrosion (Patently-O) (Hal Wegner) District Court E D Michigan: LEDdynamics wins summary judgment in LED tube patent suit… [read post]
10 May 2016, 12:49 pm by Joy Waltemath
CV 13-03826-EMC, a suit brought by California drivers, and Yucesoy v. [read post]
1 Oct 2017, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Max Hill v Mail on Sunday,  A Man v The Gazette (Paisley) Ward v Mail on Sunday. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 5:55 am by Luis Moreno Ocampo
” The Obligation of State Parties to the Genocide Convention to Prevent Atrocities The International Court of Justice ruled in February 2007 in the case Bosnia and Herzegovina v. [read post]
26 May 2022, 6:01 am by Shayan Karbassi
  While it remains unclear whether the blocking statute has any teeth, a December 2021 European Court of Justice (CJEU) ruling in Bank Melli Iran v. [read post]
22 May 2024, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
In other words, Alito is who he always was, and the "Concerned Alumni of Princeton," with their focus on white-male success, was a perfect fit for him.2) When the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit decided Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
22 Oct 2016, 3:26 am
Copinger (17th ed), [22-18], p 1626, n 94 cites the Hong Kong case of Hksar v Chan Nai Mang (2005), in which it was held that the meaning of “affect prejudicially” was wide in scope and not necessarily restricted to economic prejudice, although that was the obvious area at which the section was directed. [read post]