Search for: "State v. N. N."
Results 4981 - 5000
of 21,436
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Oct 2019, 10:00 am
District Judge Joseph N. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 5:34 am
Cardozo School of Law) has posted Rehaif v. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 1:42 pm
Quidel Corp. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 10:40 am
” Perez v. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 4:00 am
Turner, 538 S.W.3d 73, 88 n.21 (Tex. 2017) ("[N]either the Supreme Court in Obergefell nor the Fifth Circuit in De Leon 'struck down' any Texas law. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 4:00 am
The State University of New York Board of Trustees' Charter School Committee [SUNY/CSC], asserting that an independent licensure process was necessary to alleviate a teacher shortage at certain Charter School, promulgated Regulations* that purported to establish an independent licensure process from that established by State Education Department and State Board of Regents [SED].SED subsequently initiated a CPLR Article 78 action [Petitioner Proceeding 1] seeking… [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 4:00 am
The State University of New York Board of Trustees' Charter School Committee [SUNY/CSC], asserting that an independent licensure process was necessary to alleviate a teacher shortage at certain Charter School, promulgated Regulations* that purported to establish an independent licensure process from that established by State Education Department and State Board of Regents [SED].SED subsequently initiated a CPLR Article 78 action [Petitioner Proceeding 1] seeking… [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 7:42 pm
J.A. 20 n.8. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 11:14 am
For example, in Golden State Transit Corp. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 8:52 am
” BRB: That firm’s name rang a bell… Indeed, we noted the related story concerning their information security practices and news back in April.) via Bill Frievogel: Patrolmen’s Benevolent Ass’n v. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 8:03 am
In view of the now well-known United States Supreme Court South Dakota v. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 6:44 am
” In a message that Juror-12 later deleted, Juror-12 responded that “[n]o one will testify against her! [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 4:45 am
There was never any serious question that the prosecution would be prohibited under RAV v. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 4:18 am
Ctr. of N. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 1:57 pm
In United States v. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 9:00 am
(n) Dental corporation. (1) Licensed physicians and surgeons. (2) Dental assistants. (3) Registered dental assistants. (4) Registered dental assistants in extended functions. (5) Registered dental hygienists. (6) Registered dental hygienists in extended functions. (7) Registered dental hygienists in alternative practice. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 6:36 pm
CKH Industries, Inc., March 17, 2017, Roman, N.). [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 6:30 am
In United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 6:00 am
In its well-known decision of Illinois v. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 12:14 am
(See Navarro Savings Ass’n v Lee, 446 U.S. 458, 461 [1980] [“a federal court must disregard nominal or formal parties and rest jurisdiction only upon the citizenship of real parties to the controversy”]). [read post]
