Search for: "JAMES V. STATE"
Results 5001 - 5020
of 10,682
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2015, 11:52 am
Michael Knapp informed us that the Second Circuit has granted an en banc rehearing of United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 6:49 am
William Baude has this editorial in today's New York Times examining the Supreme Court's recent opinion in Glossip v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 7:15 am
Universal WHEN: Tuesday, July 7 9 am WHERE: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit James R. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 5:52 am
Here, “the Commonwealth” basically refers to the prosecution, as in “State v. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 1:28 pm
But unlike Loving v, Virginia, where the right to marry was deemed constitutionally fundamental, and the state impediment to marriage was based on race, already a criterion that was presumptively unlawful, the Court has never said that sexual orientation was, by itself, an illegal criterion. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 1:42 pm
James A. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 7:42 am
James A. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 5:31 am
In Arizona Legislature v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 2:32 pm
In United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 7:34 am
United States[13], the district court refused to enforce plaintiff’s Rule 45 subpoena that sought documents from defendant’s expert witness. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 4:00 am
In Glossip v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:18 pm
Thus, holding that the Arizona Constitution affords greater protections in some circumstances citing Arizona v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 12:21 pm
The denial of review in Kobach v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 7:55 am
In a 2007 dissent in James v. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 4:13 pm
United States A jury is considering the merits of a $850 million libel claim in the case of Bouveng v Wey. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 6:21 am
United States. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 5:16 pm
Baker v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 3:13 pm
” He goes on, in an eloquent vein, not the more businesslike tone he took with his announcement in United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 2:02 pm
previously written by James Yudes, Esq., discussed the impact of the decision in U.S. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:38 pm
In Issa v Hackney London Borough Council (1997) 29 H.L.R. 640, the court noted that the failure to update s.8 left tenants …wholly without remedy in the civil courts against their landlords, however grievously their health may have suffered because they are living in damp, unfit conditions… Likewise, in Habinteg Housing Association v James (1994) 27 HLR 299: We are told that the Law Commission has been considering such a problem. [read post]
