Search for: "Davis v. State"
Results 5041 - 5060
of 6,177
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Oct 2020, 1:00 pm
The court’s decision in Fulton v. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 7:24 am
Davis, 16-6795, has drama – it’s a capital case in which the charging memo recommending the death penalty evidently stated that one of the two main reasons for seeking the ultimate punishment against Carlos Ayestas was that “THE DEFENDANT IS NOT A CITIZEN. [read post]
9 May 2024, 9:32 am
State v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 6:57 am
In United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 8:50 pm
IP Holdings v. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 4:07 pm
Any order requiring any sort of journalistic material to be handed over to the state engages the right to freedom of expression of publishers and broadcasters under Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) and will amount to an interference for the purposes of Article 10 (see eg Handyside v United Kingdom and Tillack v Belgium). [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 9:00 am
United States, Gorsuch defended the court’s decision to send a case back to the U.S. [read post]
4 Apr 2010, 5:14 am
We also draw attention to the following decisions in other jurisdictions: Perry v McIntosh & Ors [2010] VSC 85 (24 March 2010) and Newnham v Davis (No 2) [2010] VSC 94 (1 April 2010) – two decisions of which deal with issues in pleading in a defamation case. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 10:40 pm
(IPBiz) Australia FCA: No copyright in newspaper headlines: Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd v. [read post]
21 Sep 2004, 11:36 pm
This issue is dealt with in Park Place Estates v. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 11:15 am
”); see United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm
In U.S. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 1:13 pm
Their cabinet resolved to seek the Secretary of State’s approval which was forthcoming. [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 1:13 pm
Their cabinet resolved to seek the Secretary of State’s approval which was forthcoming. [read post]
2 May 2024, 1:20 pm
Davis, 10 Ill. 2d 566, 573–74 (1957)). [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 9:58 pm
Davis, 301 U.S. 619 (1937) and MacPherson v. [read post]
11 Jun 2017, 4:05 pm
Lachaux v Independent Print, heard 29 and 30 November and 1 December 2016 (Macfarlane, Davis and Sharp LJJ). [read post]
18 Dec 2016, 4:19 pm
heard 29 and 30 November and 1 December 2016 the Court of Appeal (Macfarlane, Davis and Sharp LJJ). [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 11:54 pm
College London"Feminism v. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 3:11 am
An employer or any other person or entity that violates this chapter is guilty of a misdemeanor… Before you ask, sure, that would seem to mean that if an employee (and applicant for employment as well as stated in a footnote in Gay Law Students Ass’n v. [read post]
