Search for: "IN RE GRANT" Results 5041 - 5060 of 37,630
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Oct 2021, 1:11 pm by Eugene Volokh
First, it serves "to protect the defendant against a subsequent action by the party actually entitled to relief, and to ensure that the judgment will have a proper res judicata effect. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 11:27 am
  So they amend the thing, settle it, and move for approval, which the trial court grants. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 10:42 am by David Oscar Markus
In fact, they're the opposite....Third, and most important, JSIN excludes all nonimprisonment sentences: not just nonimprisonment sentences due to a Section 5K1.1 motion, or application of Section 5K3.1's safety valve, but rather all nonimprisonment. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 6:53 am by Unknown
As posted by Dennis Crouch of Patently-O, Supreme Court has Granted Cert in the Myriad Case, Question: Are Human Genes Patentable. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
Now, if you’re thinking to yourself that none of this sounds all that groundbreaking, well, you’re not alone. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 6:48 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
Section (c) outlines clear guidelines for those who are allowed entry based on a clear exception to the vaccination requirement Any noncitizen who is a nonimmigrant, who is not fully vaccinated against COVID-19, and who, notwithstanding section 2(a) of this proclamation, is permitted to enter the United States by air travel pursuant to section 3(b) of this proclamation—in other words anyone who is granted entry based on a clear exception to the vaccination requirement—must… [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 8:33 am by Unknown
Granted, some people who try to accurately explain a proposal might suffer from an inability to understand it and generate misleading information. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 8:12 am by Rebecca Tushnet
The district court granted summary judgment on the resulting trademark claims, reasoning that plaintiffs’ likelihood of confusion showing was “not strong enough to meet the standard that applies to artistic works. [read post]
24 Oct 2021, 2:28 pm by Melody McDonald Lanier
California, the high court declined to grant police unlimited authority to enter homes without a warrant when they’re in “hot pursuit” of someone for a misdemeanor crime. [read post]
23 Oct 2021, 4:46 am by SHG
Plus, it’s public school, a benefit for which they’re paying either way, so they should be able to take advantage of it. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 11:26 am by Lydia Estep
In DBL’s amicus brief, DBL had argued in favor of a grant of certiorari, and this ruling makes that outcome much more likely. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 9:14 am by Anthony Carbone
They do this by filing a motion with the court asking for it, and if they’re granted permission, they could either take depositions or issue subpoenas. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 8:26 am by gabrielagendreau
Interested applicants should submit a resume, cover letter, and writing sample to Patricia De La Cruz-Lynas, Director of Administration, California Indian Legal Services, Re: Eureka Staff Attorney, 609 S. [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 3:37 pm by Michael Lowe
What this means to an experienced Texas DWI criminal defense attorney is that the ADA will typically re-indict an intoxication manslaughter case to a regular manslaughter case, alleging multiple reckless acts which will include intoxication among them. [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 9:00 am by Jason Rantanen
The first time the Federal Circuit ever granted mandamus to overturn a transfer denial was in 2008, in a case called In re TS Tech, which arose from the Eastern District of Texas. [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 7:04 am by Joel R. Brandes
On appeal, the Second Circuit agreed with the District Court’s habitual-residence determination, but concluded that the District Court erred in granting Saada’s petition because “the most important protective measures it imposed [we]re unenforceable and not otherwise accompanied by sufficient guarantees of performance. [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 7:04 am by Joel R. Brandes
On appeal, the Second Circuit agreed with the District Court’s habitual-residence determination, but concluded that the District Court erred in granting Saada’s petition because “the most important protective measures it imposed [we]re unenforceable and not otherwise accompanied by sufficient guarantees of performance. [read post]