Search for: "United States v. Justice" Results 5041 - 5060 of 32,499
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
In a comprehensive judgment spanning some 374 pages and 1,153 paragraphs, Justice Jagot considered various business interruption claims from nine small businesses across four different states. [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 12:13 pm by Paul Rosenzweig
For example, the California rule just quoted then provides in a comment that “[t]his rule does not prohibit those activities of a particular lawyer that are protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution or by Article I, section 2 of the California Constitution. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 11:32 pm by Maria Hook
In 2020, the High Court rejected this argument in a jurisdictional context: see our report here and the issue has also arisen in the United States. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm by Leslie C. Griffin
Gender violence happens no matter what the circumstances are, including all the harms that were increased by the pandemic.I always teach United States v. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 4:30 pm by Josh Blackman
Today, the Department of Justice filed an emergency application with the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 9:39 am by Amy Howe
United States, the justices agreed to consider whether a prosecution in the Court of Indian Offenses can trigger the Constitution’s double jeopardy clause. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 8:31 am by Cinthia Macie
  In this respect, European merger control law reflected U.S. antitrust law at or around the time of United States v. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 6:02 am by Jonathan H. Adler
The court eventually fixed the mistake, and this is what appears in the final version of the opinion published in book form in United States Reports: "The right of the trustee to devote its land to any legitimate use is properly within the protection of the Constitution. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 6:01 am by Josh Blackman
The Supreme Court reaffirmed the state-action doctrine in United States v. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 6:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
” The specific question before the Court is: Whether the court of appeals erred when it rejected the United States’ assertion of the state-secrets privilege based on the court’s own assessment of potential harms to the national security, and required discovery to proceed further under 28 U.S.C. 1782(a) against former Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) contractors on matters concerning alleged clandestine CIA activities.U.S. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 4:36 am by Peter J. Sluka
  That’s the tough lesson that an LLC member facing termination of his membership status learned in Costello v Molloy et al., 73 Misc 3d 1206(A) [Sup Ct 2021]. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 4:30 am by Eric Segall
United States, the Court held that the commerce clause power was plenary and not subject to non-textual limitations of state sovereignty. [read post]