Search for: "Day v. United States"
Results 5101 - 5120
of 25,645
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2020, 4:05 am
At Dorf on Law, Michael Dorf pushes back against Justice Clarence Thomas’ originalist critique of the First Amendment overbreadth doctrine in a concurrence last week in United States v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 8:07 am
” To name a few: The report recommends ensuring the independence and professional protection of the “540F judge advocate” while sustaining the ability of the current convening authority to submit a statement outlining his or her considered opinion about how the crime and its prosecution affects discipline, efficiency, and morale; the report highlights the need for an independent “court administrative office,” like the U.K. uses, to manage arranging for the venue, timing… [read post]
11 May 2020, 7:15 am
United States concerns New Jersey’s well-known Bridgegate scandal, where officials with ties to Gov. [read post]
11 May 2020, 6:37 am
United States Soccer Federation, Inc. here. [read post]
11 May 2020, 3:24 am
The first is McGirt v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 1:09 am
It will be a strange day in a stranger world, when a jury summons arrives in the mail with a copy of the Manual! [read post]
9 May 2020, 10:33 pm
United States (1926) (Brandeis dissenting). [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
8 May 2020, 2:29 pm
Compare, for instance, Wisconsin v. [read post]
8 May 2020, 11:53 am
United States. [read post]
8 May 2020, 11:19 am
The NWPR replaces the Obama Administration’s “Waters of the United States” (WOTUS) rule. [read post]
8 May 2020, 3:43 am
The justices also sent United States v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 3:43 pm
[5] The SBA may issue further clarifying guidance in the days to come. [read post]
7 May 2020, 3:19 pm
[Kelly v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 1:24 pm
The Supreme Court today resolved United States v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 12:24 pm
United States, Welch v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 11:19 am
(HC 2109/20 Ben Meir v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 10:58 am
In the United Kingdom, for a period of 38 days, Boris Johnson’s administration failed to take necessary measures that health experts strongly recommended. [read post]
7 May 2020, 7:01 am
United States Department of Commerce and Litgo N.J., Inc. v. [read post]
