Search for: "Small v. People"
Results 5101 - 5120
of 8,517
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2013, 11:04 am
Also deceptive mailings: “Prize Notification Bureau” with “State of California Commisioners of Registration” seal—FTC v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 7:46 am
Thomas v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 6:27 am
In Millard v Miller, No. 05-C-103-S, 2005 U.S. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 8:33 am
Recently in Dos Santos v. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 7:59 am
Furthermore, in a 2011 judgment on an immigration case from the Supreme Court, ZH (Tanzania) v. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 7:59 am
Furthermore, in a 2011 judgment on an immigration case from the Supreme Court, ZH (Tanzania) v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 9:03 pm
Arguing for the federal government in the case of United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 5:08 pm
Many companies utilize illegal business practices and rely on people determining that the small claims are not worth a lawsuit in order to continue those practices. [read post]
1 Dec 2013, 3:50 am
In a prior post I noted the upcoming Second Annual United Nations Forum on Business and Human Rights, of the Working Group on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises, will be held in Geneva 2-4 December 2013. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 5:10 am
Next say that the remaining T-shirts will be donated to Oxfam for their charity work abroad.As time goes on, there seem to be an increasing number of cases involving big retail chains and their apparent abuse of third party IPR, as people are becoming more aware of the rights they hold in their creations. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 2:44 am
If Oracle v. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 12:12 am
Conventional thinking would have us believe that it’s just about home-ownership v. social renting v. private renting but the way people live still by-passes these rigid, stale unimaginative parameters. [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 6:27 am
If it is found that the third parties in this case were negligent then the respondent will be liable under its non-delegable duty of care to the appellant. [1] Brown v Nelson & Ors [1971] LGR 20 [2] Gold v Essex County Council [1942] 2 KB 293, 301 [3] Cassidy v Ministry of Health [1951] 2 KB 343 [4] A (Child) v Ministry of Defence [2005] QB 183, 47 per Lord Phillips of Worth [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 6:27 am
If it is found that the third parties in this case were negligent then the respondent will be liable under its non-delegable duty of care to the appellant. [1] Brown v Nelson & Ors [1971] LGR 20 [2] Gold v Essex County Council [1942] 2 KB 293, 301 [3] Cassidy v Ministry of Health [1951] 2 KB 343 [4] A (Child) v Ministry of Defence [2005] QB 183, 47 per Lord Phillips of Worth [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 11:30 am
What people need to do is take a tranquilizer to relax … That’s because they’re overstating difficulties, and they overstate difficulties because they do not understand the fundamental economic logic of all property systems, and therefore they don’t understand it with respect to intellectual property. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 10:27 am
Sally Beauty Co., Inc. v. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 7:10 am
The IPKat has reported a few times on the attention-riveting case of Resolution v Lundbeck. [read post]
24 Nov 2013, 4:00 am
CARTER v. [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 7:34 am
When terrorists were captured, the supervisor waved a newspaper and claimed the employee’s “people had done it again. [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 5:21 am
Kraft Foods Group Brands LLC v. [read post]
