Search for: "Does 1-35"
Results 5141 - 5160
of 9,560
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2014, 1:44 pm
Rpt. 381 (Feb. 1, 2012). [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 11:55 am
., Div. 1, 2014) 226 Cal. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 9:47 am
Circuit Scorecard: For only the second time during the Roberts Court, the Ninth Circuit does not have the outright claim to the highest number of cases reviewed by the Supreme Court. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 8:45 am
Id. at *1. [read post]
28 Jun 2014, 5:25 pm
On 18 June 2014 the Supreme Court handed down judgment in R (T) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2014] UKSC 35. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 3:16 pm
Utah Code 30-1-2(5) included among the marriages that were “prohibited and declared void,” those “between persons of the same sex. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 1:14 pm
” ’038 patent col. 1 ll. 42–46 (describing U.S.Patent No. 4,275,385). [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 9:05 am
35). [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 10:08 am
The disagreement related to whether exception 2 does indeed authorize such pro-abortion speech. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 7:44 am
The challenge concerns 35 U.S.C. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 7:31 am
The law outlawed “knowingly stand[ing] on a ‘public way or sidewalk’ within 35 feet of an entrance or driveway to any place, other than a hospital, where abortions are performed,” with several exceptions: (1) “persons entering or leaving such facility”; (2) “employees or agents of such facility acting within the scope of their employment”; (3) “law enforcement, ambulance, firefighting, construction, utilities, public works… [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 5:49 am
Society of Composers, Authors and Music Publishers of Canada, 2012 SCC 35 and the decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union in ITV Broadcasting Ltd and other companies v TVCatchup Ltd, [2013] 3 C.M.L.R. 1 (Case C-607-11, CJEU). [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 1:32 am
Background Last week the Supreme Court handed down judgment in R (T) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2014] UKSC 35. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 10:47 am
MacKay, II, 2 New Jersey Business Corporations § 14-6(d)(1) (2d ed. 1996).In Lavene v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 6:38 am
Id.at *35. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 12:31 am
Over to Nick.Abstract and Observations The question presented in Alice was whether claims directed to a computer-implemented scheme for mitigating “settlement risk” are patent eligible under 35 U. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
A few general conclusions can be advanced about this mode of reasoning: 1. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 9:29 am
Thus, one determines: (1) does the claim recite an ineligible concept (natural phenomena, natural law or abstract idea), and (2) if so, does the claim recite sufficient additional elements to make the claim one to an application of the concept, rather than to the concept itself? [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 7:22 am
The new UK exceptions to copyright for the private use of personal copies, quotation and parody of copyrighted material have been put before Parliament and are expected to come into force from October 1. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 7:05 am
[1] See United States v. [read post]
