Search for: "Short v. United States"
Results 5141 - 5160
of 10,138
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2015, 4:13 am
See Hamdan v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 3:52 pm
The United States is party to 51, including the North American Free Trade Agreement. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 10:00 am
”Yesterday, the Eleventh Circuit issued a decision in United States v. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 10:14 pm
Culpepper v. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 4:01 pm
United States v. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 5:28 am
The police obtained a warrant to search [his] apartment, and the shorts [Chandler] is seen wearing in the videotape were discovered, but the laptops were never recovered.People v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 11:49 am
., (collectively,“Apotex”) appeal from a final judgment enteredagainst them by the United States District Court for theSouthern District of New York. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 4:11 pm
"); 554 US at 625 ("We therefore read [United States v] Miller [, 307 US 174 (1939),] to say only that the Second Amendment does not protect those weapon not typically possessed by law-abiding citizens for lawful purposes, such as short-barreled shotguns. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 11:38 am
Or does the existence of inexpensive drones present a novel Fourth Amendment concern that will require a novel doctrine to address it, as the Supreme Court arguably charted new courses regarding GPS tracking in United States v. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 5:43 am
Bern Unlimited, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 1:16 pm
So, although the case came out correctly in the end, it took a review by the United States Supreme Court to get it right. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 8:29 am
United States. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 7:44 am
The Court relied primarily on a 2012 case, United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 12:23 pm
I mean, the United States would treat both the same, right? [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 4:30 am
They dress in shorts and black socks. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 11:55 am
In United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 6:22 am
Tomorrow, the United States Supreme Court will hear one hour of oral argument on an issue it already has considered on a few occasions since the turn of the century: the proper procedure to determine whether a convicted murderer is mentally disabled and thus ineligible for the death penalty.Over the decades, the SCOTUS has compiled a very short list of categories of convicted felons deemed ineligible for a state's death penalty: juveniles, the mentally… [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 5:41 pm
As Lord Browne-Wilkinson said in R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, Ex p Pierson [1998] AC 539: A power conferred by Parliament in general terms is not to be taken to authorise the doing of acts by the donee of the power which adversely affect the legal rights of the citizen or the basic principles on which the law of the United Kingdom is based unless the statute conferring the power makes it clear that such was the intention of Parliament. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 9:55 am
The state asks (1) whether the Michigan courts’ decision not to extend United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 8:29 am
” [9] The Court also noted that the English courts (in subsequent cases such as Pearce v United Bristol Healthcare NHS Trust and Chester v Afshar) had quietly ceased to follow Sidaway‘s adoption of the Bolam test. [read post]
