Search for: "FAIR v. THE STATE" Results 5161 - 5180 of 30,480
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Dec 2010, 6:41 am by Andrew Frisch
§ 216(b), Attorney's Fees, Contemporaneous Time Records, Fair Labor Standards Act, FLSA, Overtime Law, Prevailing Plaintiff, Scott v. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 6:21 am
In Copyright Agency Limited v State of New South Wales [2008] HCA 35, the High Court decided that the State of New South Wales was not entitled to use surveyors' plans (by copying the survey plans and providing them to the public) without fairly remunerating copyright owners. [read post]
23 Dec 2018, 7:53 am by Wolfgang Demino
(Note that the FDCPA is a federal law that applies through the US, but the state analogues of the federal fair debt collection act vary in significant ways even though they cover many of the same abusive and misleading practices. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 9:32 am
Finally, by "more time," we're talking about a fair piece of time in addition to the statutory 60 days. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 1:49 pm
  But when you renew your license, the DMV's computer automatically checks for out-of-state convictions. [read post]
22 Sep 2013, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
Drunk driver leaves road, hits power pole, Washington high court allows suit against property owner to proceed [Lowman v. [read post]
12 May 2017, 5:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Applying the Pell Doctrine in a disciplinary actionSullivan v County of Rockland, 2017 NY Slip Op 03519, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentDisciplinary penalties imposed on public employees in New York State must meet the test set out in Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 8:01 am by Orin Kerr
Therefore, the “salient question” is “whether the state of the law” in 2008 gave Stanton “fair warning” that his warrantless entry was unconstitutional. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 3:28 am by Peter Mahler
Jacobs’ notice requested Cartalemi’s “consent” to his withdrawal but went on to state that, with or without consent, Jacobs’ withdrawal would become effective December 1, 2015, at which time Jacobs would commence a proceeding to compel a fair-value buyout by the LLC under § 509. [read post]