Search for: "S. W. v. State" Results 5161 - 5180 of 14,905
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Aug 2017, 9:25 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
S. 709, 718, n.7 (2005) (“[W]e are a court of review, not first view. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 7:37 am by Bill Marler
E. coli O157:H7 is one of thousands of serotypes E. coli.[1] The combination of letters and numbers in the name of E. coli O157:H7 refers to the specific antigens (proteins which provoke an antibody response) found on the body, as well as on the tail, or flagellum,[2] and distinguish it from other types of E. coli.[3] Most serotypes of E. coli are harmless and live as normal flora in the intestines of healthy humans and animals.[4] The E. coli bacterium is among the most extensively studied… [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 4:30 am by Ben
 The Estate's action sought ownership (or joint ownership) of the master tapes and copyright by Bernstein’s company, Sid Bernstein Presents, arguing that, “[w]ithout Sid, the mastermind of the event, this film would never have been made”. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Lord Neuberger’s ‘valedictory’ speech has been reported in The Times (paywall) in which he stated that the “high quality” of Britain’s judiciary is threatened without adequate financial and political support. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 7:48 am by Anton Metlitsky
 He filed an amicus brief for the Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America and other organizations in support of neither party in Jesner v. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 5:09 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Circuit’s ruling illustrates that even the denial of class certification and final settlement of a class representative’s claims may not put an end to class action litigation. *** In Harrington v. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 6:30 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 5709 (NY App, July 20, 2017), a New York state appeals court held that a Muslim inmate's free exercise claim growing out of a pat frisk by a female corrections officer cannot be asserted in the state Court of Claims.In Potts v. [read post]