Search for: "Company v. Review Board" Results 501 - 520 of 5,322
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2012, 7:39 am by Michelle Capezza
  EGCs would still comply with corporate governance and listing requirements including board member independence rules; (vi)              Provides for more communications and information flow to investors and special provisions for providing draft registration statements for non-public review. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 1:28 pm by Jay Lechner
The same phenomenon has been occurring, albeit more quietly, with the Department of Labor’s Administrative Review Board (“ARB”). [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 12:32 pm
  Later the same day, three new members were added to the Company’s board and approved the transaction. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 9:50 am by Jason Shinn
There are some companies that will aggressively enforce a non-compete restrictions across the board. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 9:50 am by Jason Shinn
There are some companies that will aggressively enforce a non-compete restrictions across the board. [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 10:03 pm
In contrast, the Board referred to Atari Games Corp. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 4:00 am by Jessica Clogg
Federal reviews of environmental assessment processes and the National Energy Board: The federal government recently announced several long-awaited reviews of environmental legislation including reviews of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, 2012 (CEAA), the National Energy Board (NEB) by two independent panels. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 4:33 pm by Kevin LaCroix
A “failure to communicate” can no longer be accepted at the board of directors level at any company. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 8:06 am by Dennis Crouch
by Dennis Crouch Valve Corp. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 4:01 pm
Since we can’t escape one another’s company, we may as well party! [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 6:42 am by John Jascob
Tonkovic, J.D.A letter that a shareholder argued was simply making suggestions to a company board had enough "legal bite" to constitute pre-suit demand, the Delaware Court of Chancery found. [read post]