Search for: "Corn v. Corn" Results 501 - 520 of 981
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2015, 7:19 am
The General Court affirmed that the ORO marks could not be said to be scarcely distinctive, and Case T-344/03 Saiwa v OHIM-Barilla Alimentare (SELEZIONE ORO BARILLA could not be said to have established a precedent. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 6:43 am by lgraham@bc-cm.com
”   During its testimony, the Iowa Renewable Fuels Association (IRFA) suggested that the recent verdict in Americans for Clean Energy v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 8:51 am by WIMS
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Supreme Court: McCutcheon v. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 11:30 am by PaulKostro
Co., 17 N.J. 20, 27-28 (1954) (citing Corn Exch. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:46 am
Sidemans and Company Nigeria Limited v Calag Capital Limited (Afro-IP) Poland Personal circumstances in trade mark registration (Class 46) South Africa FIFA v Metcash trade mark case - Owen Dean's response (Afro-IP) South Africa 1 - Ambush Marketers 0: legal framework to help FIFA and 2010 World Cup sponsors protect their rights (Managing IP) Switzerland New developments in Swiss patent law (IP Frontline) Federal Administrative Court finds PARK AVENUE not descriptive for… [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:46 am
Sidemans and Company Nigeria Limited v Calag Capital Limited (Afro-IP) Poland Personal circumstances in trade mark registration (Class 46) South Africa FIFA v Metcash trade mark case - Owen Dean's response (Afro-IP) South Africa 1 - Ambush Marketers 0: legal framework to help FIFA and 2010 World Cup sponsors protect their rights (Managing IP) Switzerland New developments in Swiss patent law (IP Frontline) Federal Administrative Court finds PARK AVENUE not descriptive for… [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 5:46 am
Sidemans and Company Nigeria Limited v Calag Capital Limited (Afro-IP) &nbsp; Poland Personal circumstances in trade mark registration (Class 46) &nbsp; South Africa FIFA v Metcash trade mark case &ndash; Owen Dean&rsquo;s response (Afro-IP) South Africa 1 &ndash; Ambush Marketers 0: legal framework to help FIFA and 2010 World Cup sponsors protect their rights (Managing IP) &nbsp; Switzerland New developments in Swiss patent law (IP Frontline) Federal… [read post]
8 May 2007, 3:43 am
All opinions are precedential unless otherwise indicated.E-Pass Technologies v. [read post]