Search for: "Does 1-61" Results 501 - 520 of 2,806
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Feb 2012, 10:29 pm
Whilst this does have a bearing upon Mrs Justice Pauffley's decision, it is not central, and I shall therefore concentrate on the essential facts, which can be stated briefly:1. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 11:22 pm
How does Weldon describe how J&J pursues innovation? [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 2:15 pm
The particular employee in this case, Charles Lickteig, was a worker who became disabled at age 61 with 18 years of service. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 2:57 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Auth., 61 AD3d 803, 804 [2d Dept 2009]; Manning v. 6638 18th Ave. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 8:28 am by ADeStefano
Morse Diesel, Inc., 98 A.D.2d 615 [1st Dept. 1983] [an accident arising on “a passageway does not lie within the purview of section 240(1)”]). [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 7:26 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
The unconventional format of claims 1 and 18, likewise, does not preclude the claims from being definite. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 9:21 am by Eleonora Rosati
The three-step test would be also part of such a mandate: the circumstance that a parody is made for profit does not rule out the very applicability of Article 70(1) of the Italian Act: what matters is not that circumstance, but rather whether the alleged parody unduly conflicts with the normal exploitation of the earlier work.If the approach indicated by the Italian Supreme Court was to be seen from an international law perspective, then an argument could plausibly be made that… [read post]