Search for: "Federal v. Levine" Results 501 - 520 of 1,207
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2013, 7:02 am by Benjamin Wittes
Congress made an exception, however, for criminal prosecution, reflecting the Obama Administration’s public intention to try the 9/11 terrorists in federal court.7 Second, the federal government suffered what many considered to be a defeat in its prosecution of Ahmed Ghailani, an al-Qaeda terrorist and the first Guantánamo detainee to be tried in federal court. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
  Slip op. at 12 (citing Buckman Co. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 1:26 pm by Schachtman
  Interestingly, only Stephen Levin, who died over a year ago, is listed as affiliated with the Mt. [read post]
30 May 2013, 10:34 am by S2KM Limited
Health Care Law Upheld - summarizing the Supreme Court's 2012 decision in National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
26 May 2013, 3:05 am by Administrator
Federation of Law Societies of Canada v. [read post]
23 May 2013, 10:06 am by Dan Markel
Levine) Jenia Iontcheva Turner – Effective Remedies for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: A New Look After Lafler v. [read post]
21 Apr 2013, 11:37 am by Gritsforbreakfast
I wonder if he can effectively answer Marc Levin's questions? [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 9:01 am by Rachel Sachs
Perry and United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 10:36 am by Bexis
Levine, 555 U.S. 555, 565 (2009) (considering only the “narrower question” of “an adequate warning” claim; avoiding preemption of a “duty to contraindicate”); PLIVA v. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 6:01 am by Joe Consumer
  In Wyeth v Levine, the Court pointed out that “Congress did not intend FDA oversight to be the exclusive means of ensuring drug safety and effectiveness’ and that state law serves as a ‘complementary form of drug regulation. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 12:35 pm by Howard Wasserman
But most of those decisions came before SCOTUS' 2009 decision in Fitzgerald v. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 4:41 am by Rachel Sachs
Bartlett, in which the Court will consider whether federal law preempts state law design-defect claims brought against generic pharmaceutical products, here, and in Sebelius v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 9:05 am by Stephen Wermiel
Levine, the Supreme Court ruled that a failure-to-warn claim under Vermont tort law was not preempted by federal law. [read post]