Search for: "Hart v State"
Results 501 - 520
of 1,144
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Nov 2014, 4:00 am
Hart, the Rule of Recognition, and the Crisis in Iraq, (Judicial Service Association Journal (2014 Forthcoming)).Margo A. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 6:25 pm
The ruling came over five years into the litigation, after the dancers had prevailed on class certification and on their claims that they were employees under federal and state law, not independent contractors (Hart v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 9:06 am
In Brown v. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 1:07 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 12:55 am
Indeed, for transactions of a certain size, the parties will have to file what is called a Hart-Scott-Rodino filing (named after some legislators). [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 3:41 pm
Nor had the Supreme Court yet ruled in United State v. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 5:01 am
Music v. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 8:25 am
EEOC v. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 5:07 pm
” (Hayes v Willoughby [2013] UKSC 17) – read David Hart’s post on this case for a detailed exposition of Lord Sumption’s analysis of the ingredients of harassment. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 7:30 am
Her hostile work environment claim failed, however (Miljkovic v University Anesthesiologists, SC, September 18, 2014, Hart, W). [read post]
20 Sep 2014, 11:07 am
Parker v. [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 5:54 am
The word ‘serious’ was “an ordinary word in common usage”: there was no ambiguity requiring a discussion of what was intended by Parliament (Pepper v Hart). [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 5:47 am
Upholding the lower court’s denial of the motion to remand, the Seventh Circuit found that plaintiffs had not met their burden of persuasion that CAFA’s home state exception applied, as required by Hart v. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 10:50 am
Hart In California Clean Energy Committee v. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 6:06 am
The words “serious harm” were sufficiently clear taken in their ordinary meaning and there was no ambiguity so as to bring the rule in Pepper v Hart into play. [39] The Judge then turned to the question of how serious harm might be proved. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 2:54 pm
The latest issue of Transnational Legal Theory (Hart Publishing) is out.It includes:Transnational Human Rights Litigation and Territorialised Knowledge: Kiobel and the ‘Politics of Space’Philip ListeAbstract: In Kiobel v Royal Dutch Petroleum, Dutch and British private corporations were accused of having aided and abetted the violation of the human rights of individuals in Nigeria. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 9:08 pm
Hart's Executors. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am
Hart, Glen Hansen and Brian Russell Welcome to Abbott & Kindermann’s 2014 2nd Quarter CEQA update. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 9:47 pm
The big case currently in the news underscoring this point is FTC v. [read post]
