Search for: "In Re Phillips" Results 501 - 520 of 2,109
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2014, 5:39 am by SHG
In a post the other day, a tangential piece dealt with a lawyer whose watch of choice was a Patek Phillipe Calatrava. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 4:57 am by Robin Effron
Even if you're not a civ pro buff you've probably heard of the Class Action Fairness Act (CAFA). [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 5:30 am by Gus Hurwitz
We’re back for another biweekly roundup – and what a biweekly it’s been! [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 3:42 am by Russell Jackson
  Procter & Gamble recently proposed an interesting settlement of a BS class action in In re Dry Max Pampers Litig., Case No. 1:10-cv-00301 TSB (S.D. [read post]
8 May 2009, 4:13 am
"We're going after them to persuade them they ought to do the right thing, cooperate, and eliminate the ads. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 10:50 am
"Since we can't keep track of all of them here at the White House, we're asking for your help," continued Commissar Phillips. [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 10:19 am by Charon QC
STATEMENT FROM MATT MUTTLEY Managing Partner, Muttley Dastardly LLP To:  All staff RE: AGE 1. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 12:45 pm by Charon QC
MEMORANDUM To: All Associates From: Dr Erasmus Strangelove, Partner and Director of Education, Strategy and Psyops RE: VULTURES IN TOGAS Obiter, writing in  in The Law Society Gazette, refers to a speech by the Master of The Rolls, Lord Neuberger, where he considers, inter alia, the topic of why lawyers are so unpopular. [read post]
21 May 2010, 3:33 am by Russ Bensing
  Last month I told you about Phillip Sherman, who’d left his cell phone at a McDonald’s. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 5:27 am by Jeff Gamso
 And if it's true that their gutless professors are caving to their demands, well, they're proving the old adage that "those who can't do, teach. [read post]
18 Apr 2009, 10:44 am
The same student who I worked on with problems in citing the re-codified Jones Act last fall stumbled upon this somewhat egregious error from an article draft that one of our law reviews is working on. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 5:36 pm by Andrew Delaney
If you’re a Regular Joe with a 9-to-5 job, of course you’re considered an employee of Company X. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 9:09 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Katz, Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP, Palo Alto, CA Right now we’re in a complete mess; nobody knows what the law is. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 12:31 pm by Peter S. Lubin and Vincent L. DiTommaso
 The article states in part: Noncompetes may be unpopular among employees, but they’re becoming more common, according to Michael Elkon, an attorney with Fisher Phillips in Atlanta. [read post]