Search for: "In Re Weinstein"
Results 501 - 520
of 612
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Sep 2019, 9:05 am
United Jersey Bank (duty of care to understand business) In re Walt Disney Derivative Litigation (duty of care regarding executive compensation) Harvey Weinstein Employment Agreement (duty of care to monitor compliance) Closely Held Businesses and Other Considerations Regarding the Composition of Boards, Management, and Owners Ringling Bros. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 6:00 am
Michael Sirkin and Nick Mozal, Ross Aronstam & Moritz LLP, on Wednesday, April 5, 2017 Tags: Corporate fraud, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Disclosure, Duty of loyalty, Financial reporting, In re Revlon, Information asymmetries, Management, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions, Restatements, SEC, SEC enforcement, Securities damages, Securities regulation, Settlements, Shareholder suits, Shareholder voting Poisoned Chalice? [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 8:10 am
-When you’re recycling paper, for notes--know what’s on the back. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 7:14 pm
Preska: Defendant present with attorney Peggy Cross and Philip Weinstein; AUSA James Pastore and Thomas Brown also present. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 9:00 pm
Though by many they’re abhorred, Hebrew people I’ve adored. [read post]
18 Nov 2017, 3:16 am
If the “I’m a lawyer” line didn’t make you cringe, you’re not a lawyer. [read post]
16 May 2019, 4:53 am
Put Weinstein aside. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 6:08 am
Miller, and Jeohn Salone Favors, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz , on Friday, October 12, 2018 Tags: Broker-dealers, Compliance & ethics, Cybersecurity, Investment advisers, Risk, Risk oversight, SEC, SEC enforcement, Securities enforcement Statement at Open Meeting on Re-Opening Comment Period for Capital, Margin, and Segregation Requirements for Security-Based Swap Dealers and Major Security-Based Swap Posted by Hester M. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 6:30 am
McIntosh, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, on Friday, July 29, 2022 Tags: Institutional Investors, Proxy advisors, Proxy voting, SEC, SEC rulemaking, Securities regulation, Shareholder voting Statement by Chair Gensler on Re-Proposed Amendments Regarding Exemption from National Securities Association Membership Posted by Gary Gensler, U.S. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 11:36 am
I will want to know why you’re better. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 4:04 am
Video can be illuminating, but not if people don’t grasp what they’re watching. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 6:21 am
Fox (Columbia Law School), on Friday, February 9, 2018 Tags: Adverse selection, Capital formation, Crowdfunding, Disclosure, Equity offerings, FAST Act, Investor protection, IPOs, JOBS Act, Liquidity, Registration exemptions, SEC, Securities regulation, Small firms, Solicitation The Enduring Allure and Perennial Pitfalls of Earnouts Posted by Gail Weinstein, Robert C. [read post]
29 Jun 2008, 9:55 pm
What about copyright you might ask (as Allen Weinstein did at the Congressional hearing)? [read post]
9 Feb 2019, 3:26 am
It’s been out of favor for decades, yet we’re now pondering how we could have been so blind, so misguided, so hateful toward them. [read post]
14 Mar 2018, 9:25 am
October 2017: Actress Ashley Judd accuses media mogul Harvey Weinstein of sexual harassment. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 6:17 am
Meetings Posted by Kosmas Papadopoulos, ISS Analytics, on Saturday, July 6, 2019 Tags: Boards of Directors, Charter & bylaws, Dual-class stock, Institutional Investors, Majority voting, Ownership structure, Shareholder proposals, Shareholder voting The State of Play on Clawbacks and Forfeitures Based on Misconduct Posted by Jonathan Ocker, Justin Krawitz, and Ben Gibbs, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, on Sunday, July 7, 2019 … [read post]
4 Jan 2014, 9:47 am
”) Weinstein was demonstrably wrong in this assessment, just as anyone who held up L [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
If you're being threatened with being fired, you can find a new job. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 11:06 am
So, to be fair, I excluded them from the list—this year only, of course—they’re eligible now to be included next year. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 2:00 pm
There is a “well-established principle under both the Illinois [Marriage And Dissolution Of Marriage Act] that the children’s interests must take precedence over ruffled feelings of parents and even, on occasion, the authority of the court” In re Marriage of Weinstein, 408 NE 2d 952 – Ill: Appellate Court, 1st Dist. 1980 This really doesn’t make sense. [read post]
