Search for: "In re Wells (1971)" Results 501 - 520 of 664
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2011, 12:29 pm by Moria Miller
I taught at Penn in 1969, 1970 and 1971, so I know the Law School and it’s a terrific place. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 12:59 pm by Kim Zetter
Well I mean if a particular government wants to engage in abusive action, it engages in abusive action. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 1:58 pm by David Lat
'Judge Tacha, I have a feeling we're not in Kansas anymore.'Here’s a new mini-trend: federal judges leaving the bench to lead law schools.In 2007, David F. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 8:29 am by David Lat
You can read the full write-up — which opines on Midge Rendell’s recipes, as well as her list of “First Lady’s Favorites” (favorite flower: daisy) — over here.We’re sad to hear of the Rendells’ split. [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 1:59 am
Interestingly, she links to a 1997 memo that recommended FDA re-examine its 60-day aging process for hard cheeses made from raw milk. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 6:16 am by lawmrh
Back in 1971, the hair coloring product, Loving Care, was already advertising, “You’re not getting older. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 8:42 am by Eoin Daly
It has been established since Re Haughey[1971] I.R. 217, the classical statement of constitutional justice, that any public inquiry impugning a citizen’s right to a good name is amenable to judicial review, and therefore attracts the rule against bias as well as the audi alteram partem (‘fair hearing’) rule. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 6:08 pm
It includes cross references to pages in the main text.In addition to what you’d expect to find in an index, this book’s Index also includes the titles of articles in this book, a number of important years before or after 2007-2009 (e.g., “1971”), and residuals formulas (e.g., “1.2% of gross”).If you’re searching for something from 2007-2009 by date, you can look it up in the Detailed Table of Contents and/or in the Timeline. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 12:08 pm by Jeff Gamso
Well, you have a law degree, and you are clearly capable of learning new areas of law. [read post]
11 Dec 2010, 7:29 am by The Greatest American Lawyer
  So, we went from 1924 to 1971 in about 4 months of storytelling and re-writing and arguing about. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 3:02 pm
We were fortunate to have Professor Toshiko Takenaka from the University of Washington participating as well. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 1:24 pm by Schachtman
Action No. 720,071 (February 19, 1971) Karjala v Johns-Manville Products Corp.,  D. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 6:19 am
As Justice Wells pointed out in his concurring opinion in Moakley, “bad faith is not defined” in the majority opinion. 826 So. 2d at 228 (Wells, J. [read post]