Search for: "Left Hand v. United States of America" Results 501 - 520 of 639
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2011, 8:08 pm by The Legal Blog
"[The following article includes a table which lists out the statutorily permissible uses of polygraph examination in the different state jurisdictions of the United States of America: Henry T. [read post]
10 May 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
It was Ratified by the President of the United States of America on October 29, 1963. [read post]
6 May 2011, 3:46 pm by Jon L. Gelman
” Although the Sherman Anti-trust Act had been passed in 1890, the United States Supreme Court decision of U.S. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 12:00 am by George M. Wallace
Supreme Court in the affirmative action case of United Steelworkers of America v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 3:41 am by Mirriam Seddiq
  Speaking of dead and communication.In a decision that basically all but over-ruled their decision in Crawford v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 11:11 am by Ronald Mann
The amicus brief filed by the United States, by contrast, addresses the problem more directly. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 5:19 am by SHG
  They may still be enjoying their Citizens United rights to buy government, but there are still more of us than them. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 8:03 pm by Ray Dowd
Unfortunately, in the United States, the field of art history is largely a sham - and the lack of academic attention to provenance is endemic. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 9:13 pm by Sam Eichner
In her concurrence, Justice Ginsburg cited to the proposition that “lawfully made under this title” must mean “lawfully made in the United States,” as it is found in §109 of the Act. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 7:47 pm by Frank Pasquale
The Rise of Health Care’s Middlemen The United States leads the world in payments to private insurance providers. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 11:56 am by Rick
The United States of America was not founded to control. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 10:59 am by Danielle Citron
 Despite still believing Assange’s actions have been harmful, I have now come to the opposite conclusion—not for the benefit of Assange, but for the benefit of Americans and of the United States. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 6:38 am by Charon QC
My ex-wife used to roll her eyes when I said, as one does, non haec in foedera veni [Lord Radcliffe in Davis Contractors Ltd v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 2:05 am by Kelly
(Class 46) United Kingdom EWCA: Unlicensed imprecision: Pink Floyd v EMI Records (1709 Blog) (IPKat) Just sue them! [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 2:21 pm by Christopher Bird
Each week, Wise Law Blog reviews recent decisions from the Ontario Court of Appeal.United States of America v. [read post]